Abstract PO-086: Selective radiosensitization in preclinical models of HPV-negative squamous cell carcinoma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Radiotherapy is a mainstay of curative treatment for squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and is frequently combined with radiosensitizing drugs to improve efficacy. Outcomes for HPV-negative SCCs remain heterogeneous, in part due to variable resistance to ionizing radiation (IR) and modest benefit of existing radiosensitizing drugs. Hypothesis driven testing of novel radiosensitizing drugs has previously been limited due to a lack of robust, efficient, and reproducible methods to assess drug radiation combinations. Aims: To improve the throughput of preclinical studies on radiosensitizers, we have developed an in vitro system for assessing drug/radiation combinations, validated using the known radiosensitizing chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin. We extended the assay to assess the effect of ML-385, a NRF2 inhibitor that increases cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), and abemaciclib and palbociclib, two CDK4/6 inhibitors predicted to radiosensitize cancer cells by inhibiting entry into more resistant phases of the cell cycle. Experimental Methods: We adapted the 9-day viability assay of Abazeed et al. (Cancer Res., 2013) to enable drug/radiation efficacy assessments. We first validated the assay’s ability to recapitulate clonogenic survival among 19 HPV-negative SCC cell lines. Drug/radiation experiments were performed in the 6 most radioresistant SCC cell lines. ROS levels after 4Gy IR was used to confirm NRF2 suppression. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate cell cycle phase. AKT inhibitor GSK690693 was used in combination with a NRF2 shRNA knockdown cell line to investigate the mechanism of sensitivity. Western blot was used to detect p16. Cellular response to multiple IR doses was summarized using an area-under-the-curve (AUC) metric. The delta AUC across drug doses was used to evaluate radiosensitization. Results: Among the 19 cell lines, AUCs with the clonogenic and 9-day viability assays were strongly correlated (Pearson r=0.74, p=3.00 × 10–4). Six (32%) of the cell lines were reproducibly radioresistant (AUC >3.5) using both assays. All of these cell lines saw sensitization with cisplatin. None of these 6 cell lines harboured mutations in the canonical NRF2 pathway, whereas all 6 harboured either CCND1 amplification, CDKN2A mutation, or both. Only one cell line showed radiosensitization with the NRF2 inhibitor ML-385, an effect that was abrogated by PIK3CA or AKT pathway inhibition. In contrast, 5 of the 6 cell lines showed reproducible radiosensitization following CDK4/6 inhibition; with robust p16 expression detected in the lone unaffected cell line. Conclusion: The 9-day viability assay allows efficient evaluation of putative radiosensitizers. Our tests of putative radiosensitizing drugs in a cohort of radioresistant cell lines have identified CDK4/6 inhibitors to be of interest for further investigation in biomarker-selected populations. Citation Format: Meghan Lambie, Rita Gill, Laurie Ailles, Scott V. Bratman. Selective radiosensitization in preclinical models of HPV-negative squamous cell carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Radiation Science and Medicine; 2021 Mar 2-3. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(8_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-086.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».