Birth Rates After Radioactive Iodine Treatment for Well Differentiated Cancer in Female Patients With Reproductive Potentials: A Meta- Analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The association between radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy and reduced fertility has remained controversial, in part because no large-scale randomized clinical trials or prospective studies have been done in this regard. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to investigate the association between radioactive iodine therapy and birth rates in female patients in their reproductive years diagnosed with well- differentiated thyroid cancer. Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed Central and PubMed according to the established inclusion criteria, followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Each article was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The overall relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the association between radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy and birth rates. Random effect or fixed-effect model was used to calculate the pooled OR, based on heterogeneity significance. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on different age groups (<25 years old vs. 25-34 years old vs. >35 years old). Sensitivity analysis and publication bias detection were also performed. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software (version 5.3; Cochrane library) and STATA 12.0 software (Stata Corp., College Station, TX), and all P values were two-tailed, the test level was 0.05. 105 articles were obtained from the database search, and 6 articles were obtained from other sources. Three articles involving 32237 participants were included. All studies were considered moderate to high quality. Overall, no statistically significant association was observed (RR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.71,1.48, p=0.91, I2=96%). In subgroup analysis, groups with age <24 y/o (RR 0.87; 95% CI:0.76,0.99,p= 0.04, I2=0%), and age >35 y/o (RR 0.71; 95%CI: 0.59, 0.85, p=0.0002, I2=0%), there was an associated reduction in birth rates in patients who received radioactive iodine treatment. In contrast, in the group between 25 and 34 years of age, no statistically significant observation was made (RR 0.99; 95% CI:0.79,1.22, p= 0.89, I2=82%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the result. Egger’s test, and Begg’s test found no publication bias of analysis (p= 0.824; p=0.602). This meta-analysis demonstrated that overall, no statistically significant association between RAI treatment and birth rates in female patients within their reproductive ages diagnosed with well- differentiated thyroid cancer. However, in the subgroup analysis, an association was found between RAI treatment and reduced birth rates in females <25 years old and those >35 years old. In contrast, no association of RAI treatment with birth rates in females 25-34 years old was found. More highly powered prospective studies of this topic are needed in the future to further elucidate the impact of RAI treatment on birth rates and fertility.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».