MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3157449977 · doi:10.1111/1541-4329.12222

Virtual and in‐person teaching and learning activities for core food science courses

2021· article· en· W3157449977 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Food Science Education · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueTransgenic Plants and Applications
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCore (optical fiber)Mathematics educationComputer scienceScience learningPsychologyScience education

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Food Science is a relatively small yet critical field of science that covers a wide array of topic areas, ranging from food chemistry to microbiology to processing to sensory science to product development, just to name a few. Accordingly, it can often be difficult for food science instructors to connect with other instructors who teach similar courses and to locate teaching resources for the specific topic areas that they teach. This can be especially challenging for instructors who wish to utilize realistic industry case studies in their courses, but who do not have prior food industry work experience. Lastly, more recently, food science instructors have been faced with the challenge of reinventing critical hands-on student learning experiences for the online environment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To help assist food science instructors with transitioning their course learning activities to the online format and to broaden their repertoire of food science related learning activities, IFT's Education, Extension, and Outreach Division (EEOD) organized a virtual faculty networking event (IFT, 2020) where instructors shared how they transitioned their food science courses online and what innovative and engaging course activities they use to facilitate student learning in their courses. This Guest Editorial aims to summarize the ideas shared and generated from this event and highlight other online teaching resources available to food science instructors that can be used for both online and in-person courses. Below is a summary of the ideas shared and generated within the four categorical breakout rooms at the virtual event. Full URLs to access the resources shared at this event can be found at the end of this article (Supplemental Material #1). Please note that due to limited representation from Food Laws, Regulation, and Quality Assurance, participants interested in this breakout room were asked to select an alternative room. Additional food science course learning resources for instructors, shared with or created previously by IFT's EEOD are also shared at the end of this article as Supplemental Material #2. One of the largest challenges impacting food microbiology and safety courses during the pandemic has been the loss of in-person laboratory experiences. To recreate this experience, one attendee shared how they had students conduct at home food fermentation projects (wine, hard-apple cider, cheese, kombucha, yogurt, kimchi, sauerkraut, kefir) to apply and visualize the concepts taught in class. Other attendees shared virtual environmental monitoring and seafood sanitation inspection exercises, and e-learning modules for quality control and food safety issues associated with ice cream and artisan cheese production that include videos, interactive knowledge checks, case studies, and audit exercises (Supplemental Material #1 - Food Microbiology tab). Plant tours are also known to be a critical learning experience for undergraduate food science students. While the pandemic has prevented students from visiting food production facilities, increasing class sizes and stricter food safety preventive measures also present barriers to students attending food plant tours. To overcome these challenges, one attendee shared a variety of virtual reality tours of food and beverage processing plants that can be used to supplement student learning in most food science courses (Supplemental Material #1 - Food Microbiology tab). In these virtual tours, students are able to decide how they would like to move through the plant and direct their own pace and learning. Case studies are great learning tools that allow students to apply their food science knowledge to solve real problems that could be encountered in the food industry. Designing engaging and relevant case studies takes a great deal of time and creativity. Attendees shared an online repository of food science case studies as well as some that they created themselves (available upon request - see Supplemental Material #1 - Food Microbiology tab) that involve foodborne outbreaks aboard a cruise ship and within an automated sandwich production facility. Other ideas shared included assignments where students need to explain whether they think a microorganism will grow, survive, or die in a given situation and why; and where students are provided with a recipe and in groups need to write a narrative of how to perform the recipe in the riskiest way possible (Recipe Gone Wrong), noting which pathogen(s) would be of highest concern and why. Attendees reported using an assortment of tools for student interaction and collaboration. Some examples are Perusall as a discussion forum on a given prompt, Illinois Wiki as a collaboration tool to share biweekly personal action plans within a team using Jamboard and Google Drive. Experiential learning gives students the opportunity to connect what they learned in a course with concrete experience in real-life. This learning approach is frequently used in food chemistry and analysis courses. An attendee shared that their students first prepare recipes in which ingredients are modified or substituted, then students reflect on how the final product characteristics are affected by the different ingredients. In a subsequent assignment, students create zines (small-circulation digital magazines) about ingredients in packaged foods distributed at their local food bank and food pantries to help consumers better understand the list of ingredients in the food distributed at those locations. Attendees also shared that they have students create infographics/infomercials about popular beverages to gain experience providing a technical explanation to a lay audience while also creating a visually appealing resource. Other activities being used by the attendees included inviting guest speakers that are experts in topics related to the course, asking students to create and record video presentations, instructors recording laboratory exercises for students to watch synchronously or asynchronously, and students reviewing asynchronous lecture material prior to attending in-person labs. Plant tours are ideal in teaching food processing and engineering. Since visiting manufacturing facilities is not possible at the moment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some attendees reported using virtual tours instead. Some tours are available upon request (see Supplemental Material #1 - Food Processing tab) and others can be accessed from the Gallery page on Clint Stevenson (n.d.) Lab website, including tours of a brewery, ice cream manufacturing facility, and pilot plant. Adapting interactive problem-solving exercises for the remote learning environment can be challenging. To help replace some of these activities, instructors used food processing and engineering online simulations (see Supplemental Material #2 - Lab Simulations and Modules) and assigned exercises to students that required them to record a video that describes how they would go about solving a specific food processing or engineering problem. Similarly, in-person pilot plant experiences are limited at the moment. Attendees shared that to help substitute these critical learning opportunities for students, they have used e-learning modules, pre-lab modules, virtual experiments, YouTube videos, and example problem video tutorials (see Supplemental Material #2). In particular, Dr. Paul Singh's virtual experiments in food processing (Singh, 2013) have been extensively used to teach heat balance and heat transfer. An attendee also reported having students make yogurt at home and then discuss as a class the product's characteristics, processing conditions, and sensory analysis as a means of teaching food processing in an interactive way. There are a variety of approaches that can be used to teach food product development, with some institutions offering the theoretical and hands-on aspects separately (different courses) and others having one course that covers both theory and hands-on activities. One course activity that attendees agreed has worked well for them is inviting industry personnel with experience in R&D, to participate in the class. The roles of the industry members range from providing a 10-min summary of their career path and how they obtained their current position, to serving as mentors for student group projects throughout a semester. Student group activities and projects involving developing a food concept or product are known to be critical learning experiences in food product development courses. Attendees shared that in their courses they have students write a project brief on the product they have developed, and that they also have students or student groups evaluate each other's products with respect to the course's food product development project assessment rubric and the likelihood of the product's feasibility and success in the market. Lastly, product development attendees discussed the importance of developing a standardized food product development curriculum to support instructors and improve student education. Previously, some attendees and additional faculty members gathered in Fall 2020 to exchange course notes and brainstorm ideas together. This resulted in a collaboration to develop a free online product development library for instructors teaching food product development. More details on this resource will be shared with the IFT and JFSE community as it becomes available. All participants, regardless of their breakout room selection, were also asked to share the types of laboratory experiments that they conduct with their students, including both in-person and/or virtually. Ideas were provided for food microbiology and safety, food chemistry and analysis, and food processing and engineering and are summarized in the following lists. Links to a variety of virtual food science laboratory resources are available in Supplemental Material #2. IFT's Education, Extension and Outreach Division aims to provide food science instructors with helpful teaching resources, inspiration for enhancing student learning in their classrooms, and a space where food science instructors can connect and learn from one another. We welcome you to join our division for updates on upcoming events and access to helpful education and extension resources. You can also follow us on LinkedIn at IFT Education, Extension & Outreach Division. Resources shared by food science faculty at IFT EEOD networking event - core food science course activities including instructions, hand-outs, and links to virtual tours and e-learning modules etc. The spreadsheet contains details and faculty contact information: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MhOTh6TtAC0ZeVYLSEZ-PmkszoqsAOS1_ZhgCAS4Ee4/edit?usp=sharing Virtual teaching resources gathered by IFT academic community - resources ranging from videos, laboratory modules, tools, and programs: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AdzLRLILn0RvLugAyz74dWvO3OP0zYvn/view?usp=sharing

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,161
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,258

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,313
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle