300 The Use of Sleep Aids in Young Athletes and Non-Athletes: An Exploratory Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Studies have shown that sleep in adolescents is characterized by sleep disturbances. Many teens resort to prescribed or nonprescribed medication to alleviate their sleep difficulties. Research suggests that sport and physical activity may be protective factors regarding sleep. The aims of the present study were to investigate the use of sleep aids among young athletes and non-athletes, and to identify possible factors associated with prescribed and nonprescribed sleep aids Methods 35 young athletes (14.6±0.7 years old; 54.3 % males) and 30 young non-athletes (15.1±0.7 years old; 16.7% males) completed questions on sleep aids, the Academic Motivation Scale, the anxiety and depression scales of the Beck Youth Inventory-II, and the Multidimensional Self-Esteem Questionnaire, at the beginning, middle, and end of the school year. Mean scores for the school year were computed for amotivation in school, intrinsic academic motivation of accomplishment, self-esteem, anxiety symptoms, and depressive symptoms. Teens were each categorized as user or non-user if they had or had not used sleep aids during the school year. First, comparison of sleep aids usage between groups were done using a Chi-square test. Then, both groups of athletes and non-athletes were combined. Amotivation, intrinsic motivation, self-esteem, and anxiety and depressive symptoms were compared between users and non-users using paired t-tests Results Results show that young non-athletes report using sleep aids more often than young athletes (X2(1,N=65)=5.205, p=.023). Indeed, 65.2% non-athletes compared to 34.8% athletes reported using sleep aids during school year. Users represent 35.4% of the total sample. T-tests showed that users have a significantly higher amotivation score (t(65)=-2.010, p=.049), more anxiety symptoms (t(65)=-2,480, p=.016), and more depressive symptoms (t(65)=-2,126, p=.037) than non-users. Conclusion These results show a high prevalence of prescribed and nonprescribed sleep aids usage in teens. Our results also suggest that sleep aids in young adolescents is associated with mental health problems and academic motivation issues. On the other hand, our results support that sport and physical activity may have a protective role regarding sleep. This highlights the importance to promote sport participation among adolescents. Support (if any) n/a
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».