Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Mimicking an Adrenal Incidentaloma: A Case Report
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: The differential diagnosis of adrenal incidentalomas is broad and includes benign or malignant primary adrenal lesions, metastases, myelolipomas, infections or hemorrhage. We present here a patient with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) presenting as an adrenal incidentaloma. Clinical Case: A 64-year-old man was referred to Endocrinology for the work-up of a left adrenal incidentaloma discovered on an abdominal CT scan performed for left upper quadrant abdominal pain. His past medical history included well-controlled type 2 diabetes and hypertension. On subsequent imaging, the mass was described as a solid homogenous nodule with a density of 31 HU and an absolute contrast washout of 22%. Between 2017 and 2020, the mass’ size increased from 14 x 13 to 24 x 19 millimeters. Further functional imaging revealed no 131I-MIBG uptake but moderate hypermetabolism on FDG PET-CT with a SUVmax of 4.5. There was discordance regarding the mass’ localization between the various imaging modalities used preoperatively: some showed a left adrenal lesion whereas others suggested that it was adjacent to, but distinct from, the adrenal gland. Biochemical workup included normal 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test, serum potassium levels, 24-hour urine fractionated catecholamines, as well as plasma free metanephrines and normetanephrines. Chromogranin A levels were also normal. In light of these findings, laparoscopic tumor resection, with or without left adrenalectomy, was scheduled. During surgery, it was discovered that the tumor was intraperitoneal, located next to the splenic hilum and originating from the greater curvature of the stomach; a partial gastrectomy was therefore performed, without left adrenalectomy. Pathological evaluation revealed that the mass was a small spindle cell-type GIST. Genetic analysis of the tumoral DNA showed a somatic mutation in exon 11 of the KIT gene (c.1658_1669del, p.Tyr553_Gln556del). Conclusion: We report a rare case of gastric GIST initially mimicking a left adrenal incidentaloma. Localization of GISTs in the adrenal area is rare, with very few cases reported to date in the literature. Unlike other cases described previously, our patient underwent the right procedure thanks to adequate tumor localization during surgery. However, as some patients have experienced unnecessary adrenalectomy for similar clinical presentations, gastric GISTs should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of non-functional atypical adrenal masses, especially in the presence of suspicious PET scan imaging. References: 1. Hexi Du, Jun Zhou, Cheng Yang, Li Zhang, Chaozhao Liang: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor masquerading as an adrenal tumor: a case report with literature review. Int J Clin Exp Med 2017;10(10):14883-14887.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».