Skeletal Muscle Health in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Protective Effect of Hyperandrogenism or Detrimental Effect of Insulin Resistance? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) exhibit reduced skeletal muscle insulin-mediated glucose uptake. Altered muscle mass may affect insulin resistance (IR) and inflammation, thereby potentially aggravating reproductive status including ovulatory cyclicity and fertility potential. However, the relationship between PCOS and skeletal muscle mass is elusive given conflicting reports on protective or detrimental influence of PCOS endocrine derangements (hyperandrogenism, IR) on muscle. We evaluated whether muscle mass and function are affected by PCOS in response to a call to elucidate musculoskeletal alterations in the International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of PCOS. Databases of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (January 1990 to September 2020) to identify observational studies on skeletal muscle mass (lean tissue mass) and function (strength) in PCOS and control groups. The primary outcome was total lean body mass (LBM) or fat-free mass (FFM). Data were pooled by random-effects models and expressed as weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Forty-five studies (n = 3,676 [1,854, PCOS; 1,822, controls]) were eligible. Forty-one evaluated lean tissue mass and five strength. PCOS groups had increased total (0.83 [0.08, 1.58] kg; P=0.03; I2 = 72.0%) yet comparable trunk (0.84 [-0.37, 2.05] kg; P = 0.15; I2 = 73.0%) LBM/FFM. There were no associations between mean differences of groups in total testosterone (TT) or homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) and total/trunk LBM/FFM (All: P ≥ 0.75) by meta-regressions. However, mean differences of groups in body mass index (BMI) were associated with total (0.65 [0.23, 1.06] kg; P < 0.01; I2 = 56.9%) and trunk (0.56 [0.11, 1.01] kg; P = 0.02; I2 = 42.8%) LBM/FFM. Accordingly, PCOS sub-group with overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) exhibited greater total LBM/FFM than controls (1.58 [0.82, 2.34] kg; P < 0.01; I2 = 64.0%) unlike a lean (BMI < 25 kg/m2) sub-group (-0.45 [-1.94, 1.05] kg; P = 0.53; I2 = 69.5%). Some study results were contradictory (i.e., increased appendicular mass or strength in PCOS group or comparable findings between groups) and study methodology varied; thus, inclusion in meta-analyses was not possible. PCOS cohorts have a tendency for increased total and trunk lean tissue mass likely attributed to obesity. However, most critically, whether PCOS influences other lean tissue areas (appendicular), morphology, and function is unclear. Our observations do not support any protective/detrimental influence of hyperandrogenism (TT) or IR (HOMA-IR) on lean mass. Heterogeneity among studies warrants research to address any contributions of lifestyle, healthcare, and biological factors to observed differences for future guideline recommendations to improve PCOS musculoskeletal and reproductive health (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ID, CRD42020203490).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,013 | 0,009 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».