Results Of The DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 05-001 For Children and Adolescents With Newly Diagnosed ALL
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Current treatment regimens for childhood ALL have resulted in long-term event-free survival (EFS) of approximately 80%. On DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 05-001, patients (pts) with newly diagnosed ALL aged 1-18 years (yrs) who achieved complete remission (CR) were eligible to participate in a randomized comparison of native E.coli asparaginase (ASP) given intramuscularly (IM) and PEG ASP, the polyethylene glycol conjugate of E.coli ASP, given intravenously (IV). The objective was to compare the serum ASP activity (SAA), toxicity, and EFS of the two ASP preparations. An intensified consolidation regimen for VHR pts, including B-ALL pts with high end-induction minimal residual disease (MRD), was also evaluated. Methods All pts received 1 dose of PEG ASP (2500 IU/m2) during the 4-week (wk) multiagent induction phase. After CR was achieved, final risk group was assigned based on age, presenting WBC, CNS status, cytogenetics and end-induction MRD (assessed by PCR). All T-ALL pts were considered HR. Pts were considered VHR if they met one of the following criteria: i) B-ALL with high end-induction MRD; or ii) adverse cytogenetics (MLL gene rearrangement or hypodiploidy). BCR-ABL positive pts began daily imatinib at Day 18 and were allocated to allogeneic transplant in 1st CR. Beginning at wk 7, pts began the consolidation phase including 30 wks of ASP, either IM E.coli ASP 25000 IU/m2 weekly or IV PEG 2500 IU/m2 every 2 wks. In addition, SR pts received every 3-wk cycles with vincristine, dexamethasone, 6MP and low-dose methotrexate (mtx) during consolidation; HR pts received doxorubicin (cumulative dose 300 mg/m2) with dexrazoxane instead of mtx during this phase. VHR pts received 2 additional cycles beginning at week 7 (cyclophosphamide/low-dose araC/6-MP and then high-dose araC/etoposide/dexamethasone), followed by the HR consolidation phase. Continuation phase was identical for all pts. Total duration of therapy was 25 months. Serum samples were obtained every 6 wks just prior to an ASP dose to measure SAA. EFS rates were calculated from date of registration, except for EFS by randomized arm, risk group, and end-induction MRD, which were calculated from time of randomization. Results Between 2005-2010, 551 evaluable pts enrolled, of whom 526 (95%) achieved CR. 463 pts participated in the ASP randomization. Median nadir SAA was significantly higher with IV PEG than with IM E.coli ASP,(Table 1) with more IV PEG-randomized pts achieving nadir SAA ≥ 0.1 IU/mL (p<0.01 at each time point). There was no significant difference in ASP-related allergy (p=0.36) and pancreatitis (p=0.54) between the two arms, and a trend toward more thrombotic events with E.coli ASP (p=0.07). With 4.5 yrs median follow-up, the 4-yr EFS for all 551 pts was 86% [95% CI 82-88%]. Outcome by pt characteristics are displayed in Table 2. The 4-yr EFS for B-ALL pts with high end-induction MRD was 77% [95% CI 60-88%]. There was no difference in EFS between the randomized arms (p=0.31). Conclusion Overall EFS on Protocol 05001 compares favorably with previously published outcomes for pediatric ALL. Intensified consolidation improved outcome for B-ALL pts with high end-induction MRD. Relatively favorable outcomes were also observed in other high-risk pt subsets, including older children/adolescents and pts with T-ALL. We have demonstrated that IV PEG is as effective as and no more toxic than weekly IM E.coli ASP in children and adolescents with ALL. Disclosures: Silverman: Sigma Tau Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Andrew:Sigma Tau Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Neuberg:Synta Pharmaceuticals: Trust owns stock; I am a Trustee Other. Sallan:Sigma Tau Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».