Sex-based differences in program completion and clinical outcomes in patients following outpatient cardiac rehabilitation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Females have greater reduction in mortality compared to males, following completion of a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program, yet they continue to have lower referral rates and program completion. Since 1996, a local rehabilitation program has been the main provider of CR in our health zone. A standardized rapid referral program was implemented in 2008 to improve referral rates of hospitalized patients. Since then, the relationship between sex and CR completion is unknown. Purpose To evaluate the relationship between sex and CR completion and to evaluate the association between CR completion and clinical outcomes, stratified by sex. Methods: We included consecutive patients who were referred to CR and who 1) were hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable angina between 2008 and 2016; 2) had angiographic evidence of at least one-vessel coronary disease; and 3) had revascularization with percutaneous intervention, coronary artery bypass or medical management. The outcomes of interest were CR completion, anxiety and depression categories, exercise capacity, death, and need for revascularization. Logistics regression models were used to determine the association between sex and CR completion. The association between sex, CR completion, and the outcomes of interest were assessed using multivariable cox proportional hazards models. Results A total of 726 females and 2645 males were included in this study. The rate of CR completion was lower in females compared to males (64.6% vs 69.98%, p = 0.006). Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, female sex independently predicted lower rates of CR completion, OR 0.81 (95%CI 0.67-0.97). Both sexes displayed improvements in peak metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved during exercise testing (W: initial 5.99 ± 1.93; 12-week 7.22 ± 1.92; M: initial 7.62 ± 2.04; 12-week 8.81 ± 1.93, p = 0.001). Amongst CR completers, one-year mortality was similar between sex (W: 1.84% vs M: 3.27%, p = 0.118), as was revascularization (W: 14.29% vs M: 11.97%, p = 0.193), however both sexes had higher one-year mortality in CR non-completers. Conclusion Despite a standardized CR referral protocol, a sex-difference in CR completion remains. In CR completers, one-year mortality and revascularization was similar in both sexes, however mortality was higher in CR non-completers. Our study suggests that addressing the causes of female CR non-completion following ACS or stable angina may improve outcomes. Outcomes by CR Completion and Sex All NC (n = 1051) W-NC (n = 257) M-NC (n = 794) p-value All C (n = 2320) W-C (n = 469) M-C (n = 1851) p-value Revascularization-1 year (%) 146 (14.94) 28 (11.72) 118 (15.59) 0.107 267 (12.44) 62 (14.29) 205 (11.97) 0.193 Death-1 year (%) 67 (6.86) 19 (7.95) 48 (6.50) 0.442 64 (2.98) 8 (1.84) 56 (3.27) 0.118 W = Women;M = Men;NC = Non-Completers;C = Completers
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».