Spatial variability of Holocene relative sea level on the China coast
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<p>The coast of China is located in the far-field of past large ice sheets, and therefore relative sea-level (RSL) data from this region have been used to infer sea-level equivalent changes during the Holocene using geophysical models of the glacial-isostatic adjustment (GIA) process. However, there are known misfits between GIA models and Holocene RSL data along the coast of China. For example, GIA model predictions compared to RSL data from China and the Malay-Thailand peninsula show misfits in the amplitude and timing of maximum RSL (highstand) and temporal variations of RSL from the highstand to the present. Furthermore, two different preferred viscosity profiles were recognized between China and the Malay-Thai Peninsula, suggesting the presence of lateral (3D) variations in mantle viscosity across this region. These previous findings lead to several questions: 1) Are the interpretations of RSL proxies and ages robust? 2) Do 3D GIA models improve the fit compared to 1D models? and 3) Are other local- to regional-scale processes significantly influencing RSL on the China coast?</p><p>We aim to answer these questions by completing an updated, quality-controlled database of Holocene RSL data and integrating it into a spatio-temporal empirical hierarchical model (STEHM) and comparing the results to GIA models. Here, we use standardized protocols to present a preliminary compilation of Holocene RSL data (105 index points and 134 limiting points) from the southern China coast, which extends geographically from 119.19°N (Fuzhou city of Fujian Province) to 111.82°N (Xisha Islands) and 21.82 °E (Qinzhou city of Guanxi Province) to 25.22 °E (Putian city of Fujian Province). Sedimentary (salt marsh, mangrove, tidal flat, lagoon), geomorphic (Chenier ridge, beach rock), fixed biological (oyster), and coral indicators comprise the majority of RSL data in the compilation for the last 12 ka. The database is divided into sub-regions to investigate the influence of tectonics and GIA on RSL.</p><p>We apply the STEHM to the preliminary dataset to estimate the magnitudes and rates of RSL, and compare them to the radially symmetric (1D) ICE-6G_C (VM5a) GIA model pairing and an analysis of the sensitivity of the region to 3D viscosity structure. We find that sub-regional variability (i.e., spatial variability over a shorter spatial scale than the long-wavelength GIA signal) is observed throughout the Holocene. This spatial pattern suggests there is strong influence of local- to regional-scale processes causing RSL to vary from GIA model predictions because no data from sub-regions most sensitive to 3D viscosity structure (e.g., Bohai Bay) were included in these model runs. This preliminary analysis lays the groundwork to assess the potential influence of local-scale processes, such as sediment compaction and tidal range change, as well as regional impacts from tectonic vertical motion.</p>
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».