MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3160858172 · doi:10.55016/ojs/sppp.v11i1.52762

Where in the World are Canadian Oil and Gas Companies? 2015

2018· article· en· W3160858172 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Braeden Larson

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe School of Public Policy Publications · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueNatural Resources and Economic Development
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBusinessFossil fuelEngineeringWaste management

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Studying the year-over-year global presence of Canadian oil and gas companies in 218 countries provides a comprehensive picture of industry trends and patterns of exploration, production and service abroad. The Where in the World (WIW) project began tracking these trends in 2011. This paper examines the 2015 data, which reveal a variety of fluctuations in the level of Canadian companies’ activities overseas between 2013 and 2015. While 161 Canadian oil and gas companies were active in 96 countries in 2015, the number of exploration and production companies operating worldwide dropped that year. However, also in 2015, Canadian production of oil, natural gas liquids (NGL) and natural gas actually grew in six out of seven global regions analyzed in this report. As well, the number of Canadian oil and gas service companies operating abroad remained stable from 2013 to 2015, even though the number of active service companies dropped in four out of seven global regions. A total of 108 Canadian companies specializing in exploration and production (E&P) were busy in 77 countries in 2015, a decrease of more than seven in two years. They produced a cumulative 1,126,648 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d), which accounted for 0.79 per cent of the world’s production of oil, NGL and natural gas – a substantial figure despite a 37 per cent drop in the number of such companies since 2013. The majority of both Canadian exploration and service took place in North America, reinforcing the fact that the United States remains Canada’s largest trading partner, despite a 33 per cent decrease in Canadian exploration and production activity there. However, Europe moved up from being fifth for Canadian E&P in 2013 to third just two years later. 2015 also marked another milestone in the WIW project – it recorded the fewest number of active Canadian companies abroad since the project began in 2011. Between 2013 and 2015, 64 Canadian E&P companies ceased operating overseas. The dramatic drop globally in oil and gas prices in 2014 doubtless played a major role in this decline. Acquisitions, such as Repsol S.A.’s purchase of Talisman Energy, which removed it from the analysis after the first quarter of 2015, accounted for some of the decline. So did cessation of operations in the oil and gas industry for some companies, including those that switched to new areas of operation altogether, and relocation out of Canada for others. Shutdowns due, for example, to bankruptcy also factored into the reasons for the decline abroad. Also in 2015, 53 Canadian oil and gas service companies spread their expertise and technology among 54 foreign countries. And while their activity increased in the Americas, particularly with 22 per cent growth in the United States, it declined in the Asia and Oceania region. Overall, 2015 was notable for a marked decrease in the international presence of Canadian companies compared with 2011, the first year of the WIW project, when 255 companies were active in 106 countries.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,813
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,265
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe School of Public Policy PublicationsMême sujetNatural Resources and Economic DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207