Deep Learning Enhances the Detection of Breeding Birds in UAV Images
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<p>Recently, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) equipped with high-resolution imaging sensors have become a viable alternative for ecologists to conduct wildlife censuses, compared to foot surveys. They cause less disturbance by sensing remotely, they provide coverage of otherwise inaccessible areas, and their images can be reviewed and double-checked in controlled screening sessions. However, the amount of data they generate often makes this photo-interpretation stage prohibitively time-consuming.</p><p>In this work, we automate the detection process with deep learning [4]. We focus on counting coastal seabirds on sand islands off the West African coast, where species like the African Royal Tern are at the top of the food chain [5]. Monitoring their abundance provides invaluable insights into biodiversity in this area [7]. In a first step, we obtained orthomosaics from nadir-looking UAVs over six sand islands with 1cm resolution. We then fully labelled one of them with points for four seabird species, which required three weeks for five annotators to do and resulted in over 21,000 individuals. Next, we further labelled the other five orthomosaics, but in an incomplete manner; we aimed for a low number of only 200 points per species. These points, together with a few background polygons, served as training data for our ResNet-based [2] detection model. This low number of points required multiple strategies to obtain stable predictions, including curriculum learning [1] and post-processing by a Markov random field [6]. In the end, our model was able to accurately predict the 21,000 birds of the test image with 90% precision at 90% recall (Fig. 1) [3]. Furthermore, this model required a mere 4.5 hours from creating training data to the final prediction, which is a fraction of the three weeks needed for the manual labelling process. Inference time is only a few minutes, which makes the model scale favourably to many more islands. In sum, the combination of UAVs and machine learning-based detectors simultaneously provides census possibilities with unprecedentedly high accuracy and comparably minuscule execution time.</p><p><img src="https://contentmanager.copernicus.org/fileStorageProxy.php?f=gnp.bc5211f4f60067568601161/sdaolpUECMynit/12UGE&app=m&a=0&c=eeda7238e992b9591c2fec19197f67dc&ct=x&pn=gnp.elif&d=1" alt=""></p><p><em>Fig. 1: Our model is able to predict over 21,000 birds in high-resolution UAV images in a fraction of time compared to weeks of manual labelling.</em></p><p> </p><p>References</p><p>1. Bengio, Yoshua, et al. "Curriculum learning." Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning. 2009.</p><p>2. He, Kaiming, et al. "Deep residual learning for image recognition." Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2016.</p><p>3. Kellenberger, Benjamin, et al. “21,000 Birds in 4.5 Hours: Efficient Large-scale Seabird Detection with Machine Learning.” Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation. Under review.</p><p>4. LeCun, Yann, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. "Deep learning." nature 521.7553 (2015): 436-444.</p><p>5. Parsons, Matt, et al. "Seabirds as indicators of the marine environment." ICES Journal of Marine Science 65.8 (2008): 1520-1526.</p><p>6. Tuia, Devis, Michele Volpi, and Gabriele Moser. "Decision fusion with multiple spatial supports by conditional random fields." IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 56.6 (2018): 3277-3289.</p><p>7. Veen, Jan, Hanneke Dallmeijer, and Thor Veen. "Selecting piscivorous bird species for monitoring environmental change in the Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania." Ardea 106.1 (2018): 5-18.</p>
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».