Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on physical activity in coronary patients on a phase III cardiac rehabilitation program
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): College of Physiotherapists of Catalonia Introduction At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, all over Europe imposed population lockdowns. In our country, the government approved a nationwide confinement from March 14 to April 12, which restricted the movement of people to a very specific schedule. The lockdown was then relaxed, but remained in place until June 7. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a class I level A recommendation with clinical benefits that are now well documented. The COVID-19 lockdown made it particularly difficult to achieve the goals of CR, that is, the maintenance of physical exercise and the control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) in cardiac patients. Little is known about its effects on phase III of CR program (CRP). Purpose To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on physical activity and on the adherence to a cardio-healthy lifestyle in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Methods A nested cross-sectional substudy of all patients included in a randomised clinical trial before the lockdown by means of a telephone survey during the month of May. We are conducting a randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of a phase III CRP, based on counselling in the maintenance of physical exercise (time of physical exercise per week) and on reinforcing the control of CVRF for patients with ACS, once the hospital-supervised physical exercise program of a phase II CRP had been completed. Results Thirty-two patients were included. Mean age was 60.3 (SD 10.1) and 81.3% were men. Related to baseline, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups. One patient (3.1%) had symptoms of COVID-19. The lockdown altered the dynamics of physical exercise in 21 patients (65.6%), 20 of whom (95.2%) reported taking fewer minutes of exercise per week. After the end of the lockdown period and outdoor physical exercise was allowed once again, 11 patients (55.0%) in the control group and 9 patients (75.0%) in the intervention group found it easy to restart physical exercise. With regard to nutrition, most patients (78.1%) followed the recommendations to eat a Mediterranean diet. Five (15.6%) modified their alcohol consumption, and three smokers (33.3%) modified their tobacco consumption. When asked about their mood during the lockdown, 22 (68.8%) reported feeling well. Finally, 96.9% of patients adhered to medical treatment. Conclusions The lockdown reduced the level of physical activity but more intervention group patients resumed recommended physical activity. The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to result in care disruptions of varying degrees in the near future. To counteract the damaging effects of giving up physical exercise, health professionals should stay in contact with patients to motivate them to take physical exercise and encourage them to perform indoor exercise-based personalized programs to keep up the amount of exercise they take each week.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».