Call to restore funding to monitor youth exposure to alcohol advertising
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Even in the face a global pandemic, alcohol persists as a leading contributor to death and disability globally [1-4]. Evidence has accumulated over four decades that alcohol advertising contributes to this public health burden [5, 6]. Despite this evidence, governments around the globe have handed responsibility for regulating alcohol advertising to the alcohol companies themselves, which they implement with their own voluntary advertising guidelines [7-9]. There has been a concerted effort in the United States since 2002 to scrutinize the alcohol industry's advertising practices, in particular documenting youth exposure to advertising in different media. Initially funded by private foundations, this work was later authorized by the US Congress as part of the STOP Underage Drinking Act of 2006 [10]. Congress encouraged the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to pick up this monitoring in Appropriations Report language in 2008 and 2010, and the Senate explicitly provided funding for this monitoring beginning in fiscal year 2010 [11, 12]. These surveillance efforts yielded an important body of research [13-16]. Further, this body of research produced the world's most comprehensive database of alcohol advertising practices, with more than 4 million records of advertisements placed on television in the United States from 2001 to 2019. With the publication of ‘Evaluation of monitoring youth exposure to alcohol advertising on cable television, United States, 2016–2019’ [17], public health professionals and policymakers have the best evidence to date that regular monitoring reports may reduce youth exposure to alcohol advertising. This study found that publication of monitoring reports was associated with a 27.0% decline in youth exposure to all alcohol cable television advertising and a 77.3% decline in youth exposure to advertisements that did not comply with alcohol industry voluntary guidelines. Despite these results, the CDC inexplicably terminated funding for these monitoring efforts in 2020. The CDC's decision has removed a key component for prevention of underage drinking as recommended by the National Academy of Medicine (formerly the National Research Council of the Institute of Medicine—recommendation 7–3) and incorporated into the National Prevention Strategy [18, 19]. Further, by taking this step the CDC destroyed 19 years of advertising research data by terminating the licenses needed to maintain the comprehensive advertising database that was supporting this program of research. We call upon the CDC to immediately reinstate funding to monitor the advertising practices of the alcohol industry to protect youth from earlier drinking initiation, increased drinking and drinking-related injuries, all of which have all been associated with exposure to alcohol advertising [5, 6]. None.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».