OP16 Characterization of the Clinical Features and Outcomes of Paediatric Patients with Isolated Colonic Crohn’s Disease: A Multi-center Study from the Porto Group of ESPGHAN
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Isolated colonic (L2) Crohn’s disease (CD) in adults is thought to have unique clinical and genetic features compared with ileal (L1) CD and ulcerative colitis (UC). Similar studies in paediatrics are scarce. Our goal was to characterize the clinical features of paediatric patients with isolated colonic CD and compare them to patients with ileo-cecal CD and those with UC. Methods This was a multi-center retrospective study including 21 sites affiliated with the Porto IBD group and IBD interest group of ESPGHAN. Data of paediatric patients diagnosed between 2014–2017 with L1 or L2 CD, or with UC, was collected, including information on demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters at diagnosis, end of induction, 1 year and 3 years after diagnosis (or at last follow-up). Results Data was collected on 300 children (102 L1, 94 L2, 104 UC) with similar demographic features. At diagnosis, bloody stools were identified in 45% of L2 patients, compared with 15% and 95% of L1 and UC patients, respectively (P<0.001), while fever was documented in 27% of L2 patients, compared to 13% and 3% of L1 and UC patients, respectively (P<0.001). At the time of diagnosis, the median pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index for patients with L1 and L2 was 25 (IQR 17.5–37) and 27.5 (20–40), respectively, while the median pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index was 40 (30–55) for patients with UC. C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher among CD patients (both L1 and L2), compared to patients with UC, and calprotectin values were comparable. ASCA was positive in 55%, 25% and 2% (P<0.001) and pANCA in 2%, 17% and 53% (P<0.001) in L1, L2 and UC patients, respectively. Granulomas were identified in 36% of L2 patients, similar to patients with L1 (33%). For induction therapy, exclusive enteral nutrition, oral steroids and mesalazine were used in 50%, 45% and 38% of patients with L2 CD, compared with 72%, 28% and 9%, and 0%, 52% and 75% of L1 and UC patients, respectively (P<0.001). Steroid-free clinical remission at the end of induction was overall similar between groups, around 55%. At 1-year post-diagnosis, 62%, 68% and 40% were on an immunomodulator (P=0.03) and 41%, 26% and 22% were receiving anti-TNFα agent (P=0.01), of patients with L1, L2 and UC, respectively. While time to initiation of an anti-TNFα agent was significantly shorter in L1 patients compared with L2 and UC (P=0.03), time to admission and time to surgery were similar. Conclusion Paediatric patients with isolated colonic CD exhibit several clinical features which differentiate them from ileo-cecal CD and UC. Prospective studies are required to understand the pathogenesis of this unique entity and define short- and long-term outcomes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».