MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3166298177

Bridge to emergency medicine: A virtual medical student curriculum for flipped classroom learning during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021· article· en· W3166298177 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Wetzel, Simone Barbosa Villa, Kristen Grabow Moore, N. Wheaton, Christina Shenvi

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic Emergency Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInnovations in Medical Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCurriculumMedicineAsynchronous learningMedical educationPandemicFlipped classroomCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Bridge (graph theory)Teaching methodMathematics educationPsychologyPedagogyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Cooperative learning
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Intro/Background: Medical students who are matching in emergency medicine (EM) should be well prepared to start intern year with an understanding of the workup of common chief complaints. EM education opportunities vary among different medical schools. Students' educational experiences largely depended on didactics received or patients seen during their rotations, both of which have been limited by the COVID-19 pandemic. Purpose/Objective: We sought to create a free, open access, flipped classroom curriculum targeting EM-bound fourth-year medical students to prepare them with essential knowledge and practical management skills needed for intern year. We included vetted asynchronous resources for self-study paired with a robust, case-based, virtual EM elective that could be used by programs to offset limited clinical exposure imposed by COVID-19. Methods: Using the EM Model as a guide, a team of experienced EM educators identified essential learning topics to create an 8-week, self-paced, free open access asynchronous curriculum called Bridge to EM. Self-study content was paired with facilitated case-based virtual classroom experiences provided by Foundations of Emergency Medicine (FoEM). 1 The curriculum was published on Academic Life in EM,2 the FoEM website, and listed on the AAMC iCollaborative.3 Outcomes (if available): The Bridge curriculum was viewed 72,928 times from May-Dec 2020. Viewers were from 5650 cities in 127 countries. Chicago, New York City, Toronto, and Melbourne were the most common cities to access content. During the same time period, 44 discrete learning sites encompassing over 3,400 learners registered to use the formal virtual curriculum, which included the Bridge asynchronous content and the FoEM cases. Most of these sites were US based medical schools. Summary: We have created a flexible, online, freely available curriculum that can be used individually by medical students to prepare for intern year, or systematically by programs or medical schools to provide a virtual, case-based EM curriculum. Prior to development of the Bridge to EM, there was no existing online curriculum for students to use to prepare for the start of their intern year. The COVID-19 crisis created an urgent need for online and virtual learning materials while students were prohibited from EM rotations in most US medical schools. The Bridge curriculum was published during the early pandemic timeframe to meet the needs of both students and programs. Its release was met with enthusiasm from students and educators, and it was accessed around the world. The curriculum can be used to teach basic EM concepts as a supplement to a traditional EM clinical elective, or to replace it when in-person rotations are not possible. The curriculum uses principles of effective learning such as spaced repetition, application of content in a case-based context, flipped classroom learning, and interactive discussions. The Bridge platform can serve as a prototype or model for online curricula for other disciplines or for different target content areas or audiences.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,045

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,066
Tête enseignante GPT0,455
Écart entre enseignants0,388 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic Emergency MedicineMême sujetInnovations in Medical EducationTravaux en français237 207