Case 2: A curious case of nail dystrophy: Is there a fungus among us?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A three-year, eight-month-old boy was referred by a consultant pediatrician for management of a presumptive diagnosis of onychomycosis following an eight-week history of fingernail and toenail dystrophy. One month before the onset of nail changes, he had experienced an episode of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). There was no history of nailbed trauma or associated pain, and he was not taking any medications. His history was significant for autism spectrum disorder and an allergy to egg white. The family history was unremarkable. On physical examination, he was a well-appearing child in no apparent distress with only postinflammatory changes on the dorsum of the feet where he had been affected by HFMD. He had longitudinal horizontal bands over the thumbnails and the toenails (Figure 1). There was no interdigital scale and no other pathological skin changes were noted. Longitudinal depressed bands over the toenails of the right foot HFMD is a common viral infection mainly affecting young children. It is characterized by fever, sore throat, general malaise, and vesicular eruptions on the oral mucosa, tongue, hands, feet, buttocks and, less commonly, genitalia. HFMD is caused by different strains of enteroviruses, and small epidemics occur during the summer and autumn months. Nail dystrophies, such as Beau's lines and onychomadesis, have been associated with HFMD. Onychomadesis is the spontaneous, complete shedding of the nail from its proximal edge, without pain or inflammation, following temporary nail matrix arrest. Beau's lines, defined as the transverse ridging of the nail plate, is caused by a temporary slowing of nail matrix production. Severe Beau's lines can occur with HFMD, leading to an eventual shedding of the nails. Causes of onychomadesis include local trauma, periungual inflammation (eg, periungual dermatitis, paronychia), systemic medications (eg, retinoids, chemotherapy agents), pemphigus and Kawasaki disease. The lack of onycholysis, subungual debris and concominant tinea pedis help to distinguish onychomadesis from onychomycosis. There has been an increasing number of cases of HFMD-associated onychomadesis occurring in children, with latency periods ranging from four to 10 weeks postinfection. The first association of onychomadesis with HFMD was reported in 2000 in Chicago, Illinois, USA (1). There have since been numerous reports of this association globally, in Spain, Finland, Italy, France, Belgium, Japan and Taiwan. A case-control study in Valencia, Spain in 2008 involving 221 cases (214 children, 96% <6 years of age) established a clear link between HFMD and onychomadesis (OR 5.836; P<0.001) (2). The etiological agent responsible for onychomadesis after HFMD has included several serotypes of enteroviruses including coxsackieviruses A5, A6, A10, A16, B1 and B3; echoviruses 3, 4 and 9; and enterovirus 71. Patients with coxsackie A6 infection were also found to experience more severe symptoms such as desquamation and nail deformities. It is not known whether onychomadesis occurs due to direct inflammation of the periungual skin, a systemic impact of HFMD on children or a coxsackievirus-specific dysfunction of the nails, and there have been limited studies performed to investigate causative mechanisms. With HFMD-associated onychomadesis, the nails will eventually grow back, and treatment is not required. However, its recognition is important to avoid unnecessary investigations and treatment. Onychomadesis presents as complete shedding of the nail from its proximal edge. HFMD is a common and under-recognized trigger of onychomadesis. Onychomadesis from HFMD is self-resolving and usually presents four to 10 weeks after the onset of HFMD, with spontaneous regrowth of nails.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,014 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».