Soil moisture and vegetation effects on the ASCAT backscatter-incidence angle dependence
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Soil moisture (SM) datasets retrieved from the advanced scatterometer (ASCAT) sensor are well established and widely used for various hydro-meteorological, agricultural, and climate monitoring applications. Besides SM, ASCAT is sensitive to vegetation structure and vegetation water content, enabling the retrieval of vegetation optical depth (VOD; 1). The challenge in the retrieval of SM and vegetation products from ASCAT observations is to separate the two effects. As described by Wagner et al. (2), SM and vegetation affect the relation between backscatter and incidence angle differently. At high incidence angles, the response from bare soil and thus the sensitivity to SM conditions is significantly weaker than at low incidence angles, leading to decreasing backscatter with increasing incidence angle. The presence of vegetation on the other hand decreases the backscatter dependence on the incidence angle. The dependence of backscatter on the incidence angle can be described by a second-order Taylor polynomial based on a slope and a curvature coefficient. It was found empirically that SM conditions have no significant effect on the steepness of the slope, and that therefore, SM and vegetation effects can be separated using the slope (2). This is a major assumption in the TU Wien soil moisture retrieval algorithm used in several operational soil moisture products. However, recent findings by Quast et al. (3) using a first-order radiative transfer model for the inversion of soil and vegetation parameters from scatterometer observations indicate that SM may influence the slope, as the SM-induced backscatter increase is more pronounced at low incidence angles. The aim of this analysis is to revisit the assumption that SM does not affect the slope of the backscatter incidence angle relations by investigating if short-term variability, observed in ASCAT slope timeseries on top of the seasonal vegetation cycle, is caused by SM. We therefore compare timeseries and anomalies of the ASCAT slope to air temperature, rainfall and SM from the ERA5-Land dataset. We carry out the analysis in a humid continental climate (Austria) and a Mediterranean climate study region (Portugal). First results show significant negative correlations between slope and SM anomalies. However, correlations between temperature and slope anomalies are of a similar magnitude, albeit positive, which may reflect temperature-induced vegetation dynamics. The fact that temperature and SM are strongly correlated with each other complicates the interpretation of the results. Thus, our second approach is to investigate daily slope values and their change between dry and wet days. The results of this study shall help to quantify the uncertainties in ASCAT SM products caused by the potentially inadequate assumption of a SM-independent slope. (1) Vreugdenhil, Mariette, et al. "Analyzing the vegetation parameterization in the TU-Wien ASCAT soil moisture retrieval." IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 54.6 (2016): 3513-3531. (2) Wagner, Wolfgang, et al. "Monitoring soil moisture over the Canadian Prairies with the ERS scatterometer." IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 37.1 (1999): 206-216. (3) Quast, Raphael, et al. "A Generic First-Order Radiative Transfer Modelling Approach for the Inversion of Soil and Vegetation Parameters from Scatterometer Observations." Remote Sensing 11.3 (2019): 285.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».