MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3167228241 · doi:10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.2870.2870

Imatinib Suspension and Validation Study: Results from the Isav Study at 62 Months

2017· article· en· W3167228241 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Silvia Mori, Philipp D. le Coutre, Elisabetta Abruzzese, Bruno Martino, Ester Pungolino, Chiara Elena, Micaela Bergamaschi, Sarit Assouline, Eros Di Bona, Antonella Gozzini, Marcio Andrade, Fabio Stagno, Alessandra Iurlo, Michela Luciani, Eleonora Parisse, Dong‐Wook Kim, Alessandra Pirola, Michela Viltadi, Maria Luisa Bonanomi, Patrizia Crivori, Rocco Piazza, Carlo Gambacorti‐Passerini

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiscontinuationImatinibMedicineInternal medicineImatinib mesylateOncologyMyeloid leukemiaMinimal residual diseaseSurgeryGastroenterologyLeukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction. Imatinib discontinuation in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients (pts) with minimal residual disease is a procedure that allows a treatment free remission in approximately 50% of them. However long term follow-up data are generally missing Here we report an update of the Imatinib Suspension And Validation (ISAV) study at 62 months (mts) of follow-up (FUP). Aims. The ISAV study is aimed at validating the capability of digital PCR (dPCR) to predict relapses after imatinib discontinuation in CML pts with negative Q-RT-PCR results and to evaluate relapse rate, time of recurrence, survival and the impact of imatinib treatment on Quality of Life (QoL). Methods. This study involves 15 sites, 10 in Italy and 1 in each of the following countries: Germany, Spain, The Netherlands, Canada and Israel. CML pts (Chronic or Accelerated Phase) under imatinib therapy since more than 2 years and in complete molecular remission (CMR) were eligible. Patients had to be in CMR for at least 18 mts, with a minimum of 3 Q-RT-PCR performed at their own sites. After discontinuation of imatinib therapy, Q-RT-PCR was performed monthly (mts 1-6), bimonthly for 36 mts and then every 6 months for additional 2 years, to assess the maintenance of the molecular remission. The loss of molecular remission was defined as two consecutive positive Q-RT-PCR tests with at least one BCR-ABL/ABL value above 0.1%. Patients losing molecular remission resumed imatinib treatment at the same dosage used before interruption. Patients' QoL during imatinib discontinuation/resumption was evaluated through the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results. The ISAV study enrolled 112 pts with a median FUP time of 47.6 mts [95% CI: 42.8-53.0]; 36.6% of them completed the study. The 59.3% of pts were male and 37.0% were aged 65 or older; median duration of imatinib treatment was 103.1 mts with median duration of CMR of 25.4 mts before imatinib discontinuation. dPCR results showed that 23.1% of pts were positive and 75.9% negative at the time of discontinuation, with a Negative Predictive Value ratio (dPCR/Q-RT-PCR) of 1.1 [95% CI: 0.99-1.22]. At 62 mts from imatinib discontinuation, 55 pts (50.9%, 95% CI: 41.1-60.7) of the 108 eligible ones relapsed and resumed imatinib with a relapse rate of 51.9% [95%CI: 42.5-61.0]; 70.9% of them relapsed in the first 9 mts. Of the 53 not-relapsed pts, 40 (37.0% of the total) regained Q-RT-PCR positivity without losing MMR. The median time to Q-RT-PCR positivity was 3.2 mts [95% CI: 2.1-4.6] in the relapsed pts and 4.8 mts [95% CI: 2.9-7.8] in pts who developed only PCR positivity. In this latter group 2 pts experienced late relapses, at 30.6 and 45.5 mts respectively. A loss of CCyR occurred in 13 pts (34.2% of those tested): 10/13 CCyR losses were recovered, the remaining 3 were not be assessed for response. No case of CML progression or resistance to imatinib was observed. After the resumption of imatinib the median time to MMR/CMR was 1.8 [95% CI: 1.1-2.1] mts. One patient, who relapsed, successfully managed a second attempt at discontinuation. No significant correlation between relapse and previous duration of imatinib treatment, use of interferon, time to CCyR, Sokal score or duration of CMR was identified, while an inverse relationship between pts age and risk of relapse was evident. Moreover, age and dPCR results together can predict the risk of relapse: pts with less than 45 years and with a positive dPCR had the highest risk of relapse (100%) as opposed to pts ≥45 years and with negative dPCR (36.1%). The analysis of QoL evidenced a statistically significant improvement in the general well-being and symptoms scales at 1 month after imatinib discontinuation and in particular nausea, diarrhea and fatigue (p Conclusions. At 62 mts from the beginning of the study, with a median FUP of 47.6 mts, 50.9% of pts relapsed; the majority of relapses developed in the first 9 mts after imatinib discontinuation however late relapses also occurred, up to the 4th year. Therefore pts who discontinue imatinib should be monitored for a long period of time, especially if they showed positive PCR values after imatinib discontinuation. Age Disclosures le Coutre: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria. Abruzzese: BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Assouline: Novartis Canada Inc.: Honoraria; Bristol Myer Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Paladin: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria. Stagno: Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Iurlo: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gambacorti-Passerini: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,308
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2017
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207