MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3168478444 · doi:10.82308/18536

Relationships matter: examining the pathways to long-term supportive relationships for youth 'aging out' of care

2020· article· en· W3168478444 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mélanie Doucet

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen MIND · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTerm (time)PsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In Canada, youth in government care who have not found a permanent placement are expected to transition to adulthood quite rapidly at the age of 18 or 19. This contrasts with the experience of their peers, who tend to stay at home up until age 29 and remain interdependent on their support networks throughout their adult lives. Due to the cut-off of services, youth exiting care tend to have limited support networks, and most of their connections are formal and short-term. These policies and practices hinder the ability of youth exiting care to build social and human capital to support them during transition to adulthood, despite research indicating that supportive long-term relationships can act as a bridge and buffer during this transition. Research also illustrates that the status quo is not working: most young people are at high risk of experiencing difficulties after ’aging out’ such as homelessness, under-education, unemployment or underemployment, economic hardships, mental health issues, PTSD, substance abuse and early pregnancy or parenthood. There is a lack of understanding on the perspectives of youth who have ’aged out’ of care on long-term supportive relationships during the transition to adulthood, in addition to how to establish and maintain those relationships.This collaborative Participatory Action Research (PAR) photovoice project focused on elevating the voices of eight former youth in care between the ages of 19 and 29 in Vancouver, British Columbia. The research aimed to take a closer look, through the power of images and accompanying captions, at the relationships that matter to youth from care, and how those relationships can be developed and nurtured over time. Photography training and facilitated weekly group discussions were held over the course of 12 weeks. Thematic analysis of the photographs was conducted as a group during the last 3 weeks of the project, and the lead researcher executed additional analysis following the data collection phase. Forty-one key sub-themes emerged from the photographs captured and selected by the youth co-researchers as part of the photo contextualization and analysis process. These sub-themes are divided across three thematic categories: (1) relationships that matter to youth exiting care; (2) barriers to establishing long-term supportive relationships; (3) strengthening factors in establishing long-term supportive relationships. In addition, 34 concrete recommendations for change to child welfare policy and practice were developed by the youth co-researchers, identified across 12 overarching themes. Key findings showcase the need for broadening the definition of family relationships to include parent-like mentors and animal companions​. Connections to spirituality, culture and the land were also identified as important, especially for racialized and Indigenous youth. Most expressed a need for preserving and maintaining sibling relationships while in care, as siblings often get separated and the relationship becomes damaged over time. A lack of trauma-informed practices was identified as a main barrier in establishing supportive long-term relationships with caregivers and front line workers. Findings highlight the importance of including the relationships that matter to youth in care within child welfare decision-making and planning processes, and a need for systemic investment in long-term nurturing of those relationships. This requires an exiting care paradigm shift from one that is focused on independent living to one of interdependent living. Connections that are outside of the traditional social capital framework for young people in care, such as non-human relationships, also need to be valued. By including those key relationships in decision-making and planning processes, youth exiting care have a better chance at building a social support network they can rely on during their transition to adulthood

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,054
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,785

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,174
Tête enseignante GPT0,342
Écart entre enseignants0,168 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen MINDMême sujetIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingTravaux en français237 207