The Implicit Theory of Mind in the Dependence on Psychoactive Substances and under Standard Conditions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of the article is to compare the features of Theory of Mind between people dependent on psychoactive substances, at different stages of recovery and the group of conditional norm. 98 individuals participated in the research. In the study, the following groups were compared by different parameters: 1) persons dependent on psychoactive substances. This group includes patients of the rehabilitation center, i. e. people in the early stages of recovery who are dependent on alcohol and / or other psychoactive substances; 2) persons dependent on alcohol which are part of the previous group; 3) persons addicted to alcohol, at later stages of recovery. This group includes members of the Alcoholics Anonymous community; 4) persons belonging to the group of conditional norm. Methods. There were used such instruments as Theory of Mind assessment scale (Th.o.m.a.s, Bosco, Gabbatore, Tirassa & Testa, 2016); Toronto Alexithymia Scale TAS26, adapted by Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute (Eresko, Isurina, Koidanovskaia, Karvasarskyi, Karpova, Korepanova & Shifrin, 2005); 5PFQ personality questionnaire, adapted by Hromov (Hromov, 2000). For further analysis, descriptive statistics as well as several non-parametric criteria (U-Mann-Whitney test; Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion) has been used. The results. A number of statistically significant differences were found between the 4 groups. In particular, differences were found in ToM structure, in the severity of alexithymia, as well as in the strength of the manifestation of various factors and subfactors by the personal questionnaire 5PFQ. The complexity of the allocative perspective has been established in both groups of dependent persons, in patients of the rehabilitation center and within the group of Alcoholic Anonymous. It was found that these two groups are not statistically different in the Toronto alexithymic scale, although in both groups there are high median indicators, which are moderately higher the upper limit of normal scores, and there is a statistically significant difference between these groups and the conditional norm group. Conclusions. ToM of persons dependent on psychoactive substances is characterized by a reduced understanding of their own emotions, if usage of psychoactive substances continues or has stopped recently, but it is resumed over the term of sobriety; while a high rate of alexithymia is remained. Also, persons dependent on psychoactive substances have a complication of the allocative perspective of ToM, even during the long-term sobriety.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».