Iron Status, Development, and Behavior in Young Children in the Pennsylvania Foster Care System, an Exploratory Retrospective Medicaid Chart Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To 1) quantify the prevalence of iron deficiency (ID), iron deficiency anemia (IDA), and/or anemia in children in the Pennsylvania (PA) Foster Care System and 2) examine if a child's iron status is associated with the frequency of certain developmental and behavioral diagnoses. Retrospective cohort Medicaid chart review of children, from 6 mos to 10 yrs of age, in the PA Foster Care System using the most recently available data (2010–2015), extracted from the Medicaid Analytic eXtract database. Data from ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes which capture iron status and anemia, along with 16 relevant behavioral and 10 relevant developmental diagnoses were extracted. ICD codes for ID, IDA, and anemia cannot be differentiated; therefore, we used ID/anemia as a group label. The prevalence of ID/anemia was calculated and the prevalence of developmental delays and behavioral impairments among those diagnosed with ID/anemia was compared to those who were not diagnosed with ID/anemia. Group differences were determined using Pearson's chi-squared tests. From 2010–2015, there were 50,311 children, ages 6 mos to 10 yrs, in the PA Foster Care System. Of these, 1,365 (2.7%) were diagnosed with ID/anemia. Specific delays in development (a category with several sub-diagnoses) were reported in 48% of children with ID/anemia and 19% of children without diagnosed ID/anemia (χ2 = 679.42, p < 0.001). Moderate, severe, and profound intellectual disability (IQ < 49) were each reported in 0.5% of children with ID/anemia, and in children without diagnosed ID/anemia, in 0.16% (χ2 = 9.84, p = 0.002), 0.1% (χ2 = 19.79, p < 0.001), and 0.08% (χ2 = 26.44, p < 0.001), respectively. Adjustment disorder with depressive mood was reported in 1% of children with diagnosed ID/anemia and 0.6% of children without (χ2 = 4.10, p < 0.05). Irritability was different between groups (χ2 = 59.91, p < 0.001; 0.9% of children with ID/anemia and 0.1% of children without). In 2010–2015, 2.7% of children in PA Foster Care (6 mos-10 yrs old) were diagnosed as ID, IDA, and/or anemic. Frequency of developmental and behavioral diagnoses were generally greater in children with ID, IDA, or anemia, emphasizing the need for follow up of these children. The John L. Beard Endowment and the CHHD Limited Endowment Funds, The Pennsylvania State University.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».