MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3170616983 · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.04.036

World Health Organization Recommends Comprehensive School Health Services and Provides a Menu of Interventions

2021· article· en· W3170616983 sur OpenAlexaff
David A. Ross, Mary Louisa Plummer, Paul Montgomery, Kid Kohl, Nandi Siegfried, Elizabeth Saewyc, Valentina Baltag

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Adolescent Health · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueSchool Health and Nursing Education
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesWorld Health OrganizationDepartment for International Development, UK GovernmentBill and Melinda Gates FoundationUnited States Agency for International Development
Mots-clésPsychological interventionSchool healthAdolescent healthMedicineEnvironmental healthPsychologyGerontologyMedical educationNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Schools have unmatched potential to provide health services to older children and adolescents. Nowadays, in virtually every country of the world, the great majority of school-age children and adolescents (5–19 years) attend school on approximately half of the days of the year. Global net primary and secondary school enrolment rates 1The net school enrolment rate is the number of students of official school age who are enrolled in education as a percentage of the total children of the official school-age population.1The net school enrolment rate is the number of students of official school age who are enrolled in education as a percentage of the total children of the official school-age population. have increased substantially over recent decades; by 2020, they were estimated to have reached 89% and 66%, respectively [[1]World BankSchool enrollment, primary (% net). World Bank, Washington DC2020https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.NENRDate accessed: February 18, 2021Google Scholar,[2]World BankSchool enrollment, secondary (% net). World Bank, Washington DC2020Date accessed: February 18, 2021Google Scholar]. In countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, children and adolescents are estimated to spend an average of 7,590 hours in the classroom over the 8–10 years that they are in primary and lower secondary school [[3]Thompson D. Leis M. Davies N. Viner R. Building healthy societies: A framework for integrating health and health promotion into education. World Innovation Summit for Health, Doha, Qatar2020Google Scholar]. School health services may be the only institutional way to meet the health-care needs of most school-age children and adolescents on a regular basis and at scale [[4]Knopf J.A. Finnie R.K.C. Peng Y. et al.School-based health centers to advance health equity: A community guide systematic review.Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51: 114-126Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar]. School health services also have the potential to increase health equity through improved access to services because they are usually free at the point of use and are provided within, or very close to, the school. This can be especially important for underserved children and adolescents who do not have adequate coverage with effective health services for their needs. Furthermore, when implemented with reasonable quality, school health services are highly valued by students, parents, and communities [[5]Montgomery P, Ross DA, Patterson J, Bach-Mortensen AM. The effectiveness and acceptability of comprehensive and multicomponent school health services: A systematic review. J Adolesc Health (in press)Google Scholar]. Despite all these potential advantages and the fact that most countries have established school health service programs, these programs generally have not received the attention they deserve from researchers, policy-makers, and development partners [[6]Baltag V. Saewyc E. Pairing children with health services: The Changing Role of school health services in the 21st Century.in: Cherry A.L. International Handbook on Adolescent Health and Development: The Public Health Response. Chapter 24. Springer, New York2017: pp463-477Crossref Scopus (2) Google Scholar]. In high-income countries, school health services often rely on a network of school nurses, sometimes including school-based health centers [[4]Knopf J.A. Finnie R.K.C. Peng Y. et al.School-based health centers to advance health equity: A community guide systematic review.Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51: 114-126Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar,[7]Baltag V. Pachyna A. Hall J. Global overview of school health services: Data from 102 countries.Health Behav Policy Rev. 2015; 2: 268-283Crossref Google Scholar]. However, in many low- or middle-income countries, school health service programs are more severely underfunded and/or delivered with limited reach and scope [[7]Baltag V. Pachyna A. Hall J. Global overview of school health services: Data from 102 countries.Health Behav Policy Rev. 2015; 2: 268-283Crossref Google Scholar]. In practice, in numerous low- or middle-income countries, school health services are limited to those that can be delivered by teachers, such as counseling or periodic deworming, and/or to rare visits by clinical staff from a local health facility, for example, to administer human papillomavirus vaccinations. This situation represents a critical missed opportunity. It means that adolescents in these contexts will often only contact health services if they are ill or injured, and with delay, when they are severely ill. Furthermore, adolescence is a key period for the onset of many health concerns, such as mental health or visual acuity disorders. It is also when different kinds of risk behaviors that have major impacts on future adult mortality and morbidity are either initiated or consolidated, such as the use of alcohol, tobacco and other substances, risky sexual behaviors, and the adoption of healthy or unhealthy dietary and exercise habits [[8]WHO/UNAIDS/UNESCO/UNFPA/UNICEF/UN Women/World Bank/PMNCH/EWEC 2017. Global AA-HA! (Accelerated Action for the Health of Adolescents)Guidance to support country implementation. World Health Organization, Geneva2017Google Scholar]. In 1995, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Global School Health Initiative, which later developed into the multiagency Focusing Resources on Effective School Health (FRESH) Initiative. This defined six interrelated pillars of a health-promoting school [[9]FRESHThe FRESH framework.https://www.fresh-partners.org/fresh-framework.htmlDate accessed: February 18, 2021Google Scholar]:1.Healthy school policies2.Physical school environment3.Social school environment4.Health skills and education5.Links with parents and community6.Access to (school) health services Until now, there have not been any global recommendations on what the health services pillar should include. In an important new development, WHO has published its first-ever guideline on school health services [[10]World Health OrganizationGuideline on school health services. World Health Organization, Geneva2021Google Scholar]. The guideline is based on systematic reviews of the literature on the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of comprehensive or multicomponent school health services. It also draws on a review of global WHO publications to identify health service interventions for 5- to-19-year-olds for consideration, followed by a global survey of 442 school health experts on the relative suitability of these interventions for inclusion in school health services. This evidence base informed the guideline as it was developed by school health experts within WHO and UNESCO, with the support of a diverse guideline development group of 16 academics, national policy-makers, and program managers representing all regions of the world, with inputs from six independent reviewers. The guideline makes a strong recommendation that comprehensive school health services should be implemented in schools. It goes on to provide a menu of 87 specific interventions categorized as essential or suitable for inclusion within school health services either everywhere (e.g., provision of first aid, promotion of menstrual hygiene management) or in certain geographical contexts only (e.g., micronutrient supplementation, promotion of insecticide-treated bednets). The menu is organized as a matrix by eight health areas:1.General/cross-cutting2.Positive health and development3.Unintentional injury4.Violence5.Sexual and reproductive health (including HIV)6.Communicable diseases7.Noncommunicable diseases, sensory functions, physical disability, oral health, nutrition, and physical activity8.Mental health, substance use, and self-harm and by seven types of health activity:1.Health promotion2.Health education3.Screening leading to care and/or referral and support, as appropriate4.Preventive interventions5.Clinical assessment leading to care and/or referral and support, as appropriate6.Health services management7.Support for other pillars of a health-promoting school The guideline includes a compendium of excerpts from WHO source documents related to each of the 87 interventions so that readers can see the basis for their inclusion. The aim is that this guideline will be the first in a series of detailed global guidance documents on school health service programing and implementation that will be produced by WHO in the coming years. It is part of the resource package to inform the new WHO/UNESCO initiative Make Every School a Health Promoting School through a standard-driven approach [[11]World Health Organization and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural OrganizationMaking every school a health promoting school. Geneva: World Health Organization.https://www.who.int/activities/making-every-school-a-health-promoting-schoolDate accessed: March 2, 2021Google Scholar]. This guideline comes at a unique time in history, when the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vital link between educational institutions and health. One of many effects of school closures or shifts to remote learning during the pandemic has been studentś reduced access to school health services. This is likely to have had a particularly harsh impact on vulnerable and/or underserved children and adolescents, which makes it even more critical that adequately resourced and well-implemented school health services are part of efforts to “build back better” after the pandemic. The WHO guideline on school health services represents the results of over two yearś work by WHO and UNESCO staff, academics, policy-makers, and program implementers. The evidence reviewed during the guideline's development shows that if comprehensive school health services are implemented well, they will be well-accepted and will bring important benefits for students. The guideline provides unambiguous support for comprehensive school health services. It will promote the implementation of evidence-based services through its menu of interventions, will strengthen the school nursing and school health professions around the world, and ultimately should contribute to improvements in the health and well-being of children and adolescents globally. The authors wish to thank the World Health Organization (WHO)/United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) School Health Services Guideline Steering Group and the external Guideline Development Group. They also thank the team who carried out an initial systematic overview of systematic reviews of comprehensive school health services, the team who conducted the systematic reviews of the effectiveness and acceptability of comprehensive school health services, the team who administered the global survey of expert opinion on school health services, the 442 survey participants, and the independent experts who reviewed the draft guideline.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,503
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,088
Tête enseignante GPT0,463
Écart entre enseignants0,374 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Adolescent HealthMême sujetSchool Health and Nursing EducationTravaux en français237 207