Tooth Removal in the Leopard Gecko and the de Novo Formation of Replacement Teeth
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction and Objectives: The ability to replace teeth throughout life is a trait found in most vertebrates and was present in ancient mammals. Modern mammals including humans can only replace their teeth once and much effort is currently being devoted to uncovering stem cells to be used in tooth regeneration. Work from our lab and others has identified some of the differences in the reptilian dentition that could underlie the basis of polyphyodonty. In lizards, the dental lamina, a source of putative dental epithelial progenitor cells, persists until adulthood. In contrast, in humans there are very few remnants of the dental lamina remaining once the permanent dentition is complete. In this project we use the leopard gecko ( Eublepharis macularius ) and surgical treatments to trace the contribution of label‐retaining cells to the next generation of teeth. We hypothesized that premature removal of unerupted second generation teeth will stimulate populations of quiescent label‐retaining cells to proliferate. Then by following the labeled cells for several months we will identify progeny of the epithelial progenitor cells in newly formed teeth. Materials and Methods: Second generation, unerupted teeth were removed from geckos under sedation. A pulse of BrdU was administered over 3 sequential days. Animals were euthanized at 1 week post surgery (immediately after the BrdU pulse or time 0) and 1 or 2 months post surgery (N = 3 animals per timepoint). Animals were processed for immunofluorescence staining with BrdU antibodies. We counted the proportion of nuclei in the dental lamina that stained positive for BrdU. Results: One week after the surgery, we identified statistically significant higher uptake of BrdU in the dental epithelium of treated as compared to the control, non‐manipulated regions (P < 0.01). One month after the surgery, there was a significant decrease in BrdU label in the dental lamina (P< 0.001), decreasing to the same level as controls at time zero The newly formed tooth buds regenerating in the sites of tooth removal contained BrdU labeled cells in all parts of the enamel organ. The original label‐retaining cells divided several times since the original pulse, based on the fragmented appearance of the BrdU in the nuclei. Conclusion: In our previous work, it was difficult to label the quiescent cells of the dental lamina. Here the removal of the successional teeth stimulates proliferation of the dental lamina. With a larger population of label‐retaining cells that could be tracked we were able to find transit amplifying cells that divide and contribute to the enamel organ. Significance: We have developed an injury model that will allow us to test the ability of different signals to regulate the activity of stem cells. Moreover label‐retaining cells are multipotent and can self‐renew, thereby possessing some of the properties of progenitor cells.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».