Pain assessment and treatment in bleeding disorders: The need for social work specific education
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of this research was to examine what social workers currently understand and practice in pain management, specifically in bleeding disorder care. First, a scoping review was conducted to examine the breadth of research relevant to social work in pain management and bleeding disorders. Second, qualitative interviews were conducted with members of the Canadian Social Workers in Hemophilia Care (CSWHC) to identify the current state of understanding of the social work role in pain management and to explore the requirements for future pain education. \nThe research question for the scoping review was: What do social workers currently contribute to pain management in patients at risk of pain with chronic disease? In total, there were 13 articles included. These articles discussed three core social work interventions utilized in pain management practice: instrumental services, counselling services, and assessments. Advocacy and policy development were noted in a small number of these studies and require further development and research. \nTo address the overall aim of this project, qualitative interviews were conducted with 12 members of the CSWHC and examined using thematic analysis. The two research questions guiding the inquiry were: 1) What do social workers in the CSWHC currently understand about pain and bleeding disorder care and their practice, and 2) What specific pain knowledge and training is prioritized by social workers in the CSWHC. Four themes were developed: 1) Limited comprehension of key issues related to pain; 2) Conditioned to push through pain; 3) Expanding pain knowledge to enhance practice; 4) How we practice social work and choose to step in. \nThe findings from each study were synthesized and indicated there are common elements of the social work role in pain management and bleeding disorder care. While assessments were identified in both studies, the types of assessments explicitly used in pain management require further study. This study identified that future education and research is required in knowledge of pain mechanisms, assessments specific to pain, and the awareness of non-pharmacological pain interventions. Advocacy and policy development require further development in the understanding and function of daily practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».