First Report of <i>Aloe vera</i> Rust Caused by <i>Uromyces aloes</i> in an Ornamental Nursery in the United States
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. is a tropical evergreen perennial in the family Liliaceae. Native to the Arabian Peninsula, it is sold in Pennsylvania as an ornamental and for its medical and topical purposes due to its high levels of amino acids, anthraquinones, saponins, and vitamins A, B, C, E (Sahu et al. 2013). In February 2020, at an ornamental plant nursery in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 5 out of 15 mature A. vera plants in 15 cm pots showed symptoms and signs of rust on the leaves, exhibiting dark-brown erumpent pycnial spots with a chlorotic band surrounding the infected tissue that turned necrotic after three days of incubation at 20°C. Only the telial stage was present. Sori (n=25) were rounded, concentrically arranged, 0.2-3.7 mm, and covered by a brown epidermis. Teliospores (n=40) were amphigenous, orange-brown, globose to ellipsoidal, measuring (29.2) 30.4-36.1 (39.5) × (27.4) 27.6-30.1 (30.5) µm, with a wall thickness of 4-5 µm, and a persistent hyaline pedicel ranging from 5 to 57.1 µm in length and 5.2 to 9.3 µm in width. These measurements were comparable to the descriptions of Uromyces aloes previously reported from India (teliospore size 25-42.5 x 20-30 µm, wall thickness 3-5 µm, and pedicel size 25-95 x 5-6.25 µm), and South Africa (teliospore size 30-44 x 24-32 µm, wall thickness 4-6 µm, and pedicel size 6-20 µm) (Maier et al. 2007; Soni et al. 2011). Based on these morphological traits and the plant host, the causal agent was identified as Uromyces aloes (Cooke) Magnus (Pucciniaceae, Uredinales). The sample was also independently identified as U. aloes by the USDA APHIS PPQ Beltsville lab (Interception # APEMD200552555001) based on morphological characteristics. Teliospores were harvested with a sterile pin, transferred to a 1.5 ml tube with DNA extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCL, 10 mM EDTA, 1 M KCl, pH 8) and macerated using a plastic mini-pestle. The DNA was precipitated using isopropanol, washed with 70% ethanol, and reconstituted in 50 µl of PCR-grade water. The segment of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) was amplified using ITS4/ITS5 primers (White et al. 1990). The nuclear ribosomal small subunit (18S) was amplified with rust specific primers Rust18S-R (Aime 2006) and NS1 (White et al. 1990). The nuclear ribosomal large subunit (28S) was amplified with primers LR0R and LR7 (Vilgalys et al. 1990). Amplified PCR products were cleaned using ExoSap (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) or QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and sequenced at Penn State Genomics Core Facility. The nucleotide sequences were trimmed, analyzed, and aligned using Geneious 11.1.5 software (Biomatters, Auckland, NZ). The resulting 692-bp segment of the ITS, 1,633-bp segment of the 18S, and the 1,324-bp segment of the 28S regions were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers MT136509, MZ146345, and MZ146342, respectively. Based on GenBank BLAST analysis, a 529-bp fragment of our 28S product was found to share 98.87% (523/529) identity with U. aloes isolate WM3290 (DQ917740) from South Africa, with three nucleotide differences and three gaps between the two strains. Comparisons among ITS and 18S sequences could not be made because no ITS or 18S sequence data from U. aloes has previously been deposited in GenBank. To our knowledge, this is the first report of U. aloes from A. vera in the United States. Infected plants were confined inside a greenhouse and have been destroyed. Since the plants were purchased from either Ontario, Canada or Florida, the extent of infection in the United States is unknown.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».