Anatomy in Medical Education: A Canadian Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The anatomical sciences have always been regarded as an essential element of medical education. In Canada, the methodology and time dedicated to anatomy teaching are currently unknown. In an effort to create a comprehensive view of anatomical education in Canadian medical schools, surveys were sent out to course directors and discipline leaders. Participants were asked about gross anatomy, histology, and embryology. Data was collected on total course hours, total classroom hours, large and small group hours as well as laboratory hours for the 2016/17 year. There have been two major changes in the delivery of the anatomical sciences. First, most programs deliver anatomical sciences using an integrative approach. The shift towards integration is also prevalent in the United States of America. Secondly, contact time in the anatomical sciences are at historically low levels. Compared to data published from a similar survey published in 2018, Canada has 72%, 49% and 53% of the hours of gross anatomy, histology, and embryology respectively, compared to the USA. The reasons for the difference between Canadian and USA schools is not known. Possible reasons for the disparity include the steering effects of the CanMEDS framework in Canada and the USMLE (United States Medical Licensing Examinations) Step 1 examination. The CanMEDS framework identifies six core competencies that are meant to ensure that physicians have more of a comprehensive foundation as a medical expert but an understanding of the basic sciences, including anatomy, is not a core competency rather it is assumed to be part of all competencies to some degree. Given there is no explicit role identified for the anatomical, or any other, sciences this may have led to the general decrease in curricular focus. A focus for many medical schools in the USA is student success on the USMLE Step 1 which is focused on basic sciences, including anatomy. Student performance on the USMLE drives curriculum standards. Further investigation is required to determine if the lower amount of anatomical science education received by Canadian medical students affects student performance in clerkship, residency and beyond. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».