It Does Not Do to Dwell on Single Components and Forget the Importance of Complete Networks: Optimizing an Integrated Hemodynamic Model Derived from Experimental Data
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In our previous study, we demonstrated the important role of capillary resistance and venular network geometry on arteriolar blood flow and red blood cell (RBC) distribution in terminal arterioles (TAs). Using arteriolar and corresponding venular networks reconstructed from intravital videomicroscopy (IVVM) data obtained in rat gluteus maximus preparations, as well as mathematical modelling and simulation, we showed that for RBC flow, adding the same resistance to all TAs to represent downstream capillary beds significantly decreased the coefficient of variation of TA RBC flow (CV TA (RBC), standard deviation/mean, n = 8 networks) by 37%, whereas, adding the venular network did not further significantly change CV TA (RBC). However, we found that adding constant resistive elements to the TAs did not significantly decrease the coefficient of variation of TA tube hematocrit, whereas, adding the venular network significantly decreased CV TA (H T ) by 20%. Given the need for this network‐oriented approach, we are optimizing our arteriolar network analysis to include as much detail as possible through experimental acquisition and data reconstruction of arterioles and venules, as well as estimation of missing data using theoretical methods. Our goal is to develop an analysis technique that accounts for the interconnectivity of microvascular systems, and that can be applied to networks in a wide range of situations. In our current methods, we reconstructed corresponding arteriolar and venular networks from experimental data, and estimated and applied total capillary resistance for each network, based on the arteriolar network resistance and the relative pressure drop between the arteriolar and capillary sections of the network. The capillary resistance is now distributed to each TA segment according to its diameter, and therefore, variable. We acquired fluorescent streaks for experimental blood flow data in an arteriolar network, which we used to validate flow values predicted by our model. Using the experimental flow data, we also calculated a Murray's law exponent of approximately a=2.8, to which we compared predicted values. For 3 networks, we found a=2.78±0.30 using variable capillary resistance vs. a=1.95±0.17 using constant capillary resistance. Our results, using improved theoretical methods and newly acquired flow data, show that our network‐oriented approach is moving towards more accurately predicting hemodynamic properties of arteriolar networks under normal baseline conditions. We are currently working to extend this approach and apply it to networks under different experimental conditions. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Grants R4081A03 (DG) and R4218A03 (DNJ). This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».