Ecumenical Houses Conjoined: J.E.S. and the North American Academy of Ecumenists
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Journal Studies' Ecumenical News Notes section debuted the first volume's third issue (Fall, 1964) to apprise readers foundations laid for significant and exuberant ecumenical initiatives on local, national, and international levels. Examples from the first two years reporting include details about the first Hungarian Catholic-Lutheran Dialogue; the establishment the Gustave Weigel Society Washington, DC; the launching the Eastern Churches Review, and planning for a single common Christian Pavilion for Montreal's 1967 World Exhibition (the Vatican would have no separate pavilion). The third issue 1966 notified readers concerted planning that was underway for the Inaugural Conference the North American Academy Ecumenists. (1) The second (spring) issue 1967 provided details the soon-to-transpire conference, this on the same page that informed the success the Paulist Press-supported Living Room Dialogues initiative. (2) The subsequent conference report was accompanied by a special editorial commentary by Journal co-editor Elwyn A. Smith: Two years preparatory work were consummated at Chicago on June 18, 1967, with the founding the North American Academy Ecumenists.... Throughout Christendom the house that ecumenism must live is being built. The new Academy is spacious and well-joined. (3) Smith followed through noting that the initial list Academy members included many leading ecumenical scholars and leaders known to the readers this Journal.... In all, eleven the Journal's authors and four its associate editors participated the founding the (4) Within two years the Journal and Academy became organizationally conjoined at the intersection their core purposes. The Journal committed itself to the illumination of subjects new to modern ecumenical conversation ... [and] aspects faith and life which can improve our understanding problems which now resist solution and reconciliation, (5) and the Academy applied itself to the provision channels for mutual professional assistance, technical information about recent ecumenical developments, and training opportunities for those who will be called upon to give guidance ecumenical dialogue. (6) What follows here may be read as an extension this author's 1998 study the N.A.A.E's formative decade (7) and how the affiliated Academy and Journal together experienced and weathered the alternating updrafts and downdrafts the prevailing ecumenical climate North America through the subsequent decade-and-a-half. In the course a 1965 meeting, the Academy's planning architects engaged Smith about establishing the Journal as in some sense, the organ our association. (8) In March 1966, at Notre Dame, both Smith and Journal co-editor Leonard Swidler were received as guests at an Academy Planning Committee meeting. The inaugural meeting the N.A.A.E. convened with the Rev. William Top-moeller, S.J. (Loyola University, Chicago), chairing. Committees on courtesies and news releases presented their reports. The Constitution Committee provided a detailed review its work. The sub-report the Ad Hoc Committee on Future Programs, Publications, and Budget noted as follows: We heard a report on certain conversations that some our members have had with the Journal Studies. This revealed that a link with that distinguished Journal may be possible. The conversations thus far have been exploratory and have not yet obviously come to the state formal proposal. Since this arrangement would entail definite financial arrangements as well as a formal link with the Journal Studies, we recommend that the Executive Committee look further into the matter and when a proposal might take shape to bring it before the plenary assembly the Academy. (9) In late June 1967, Smith wrote to Executive Member John W. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle