WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING OF MATCHED PRIMARY AND RELAPSED DLBCL REVEALS DISTINCT EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS ASSOCIATED WITH RELAPSE TIMING
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a genetically heterogeneous disease with poor outcomes for the 40% of patients who relapse or are refractory to frontline therapy. To explore genetic changes associated with relapse, we applied fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), gene expression profiling, and whole genome sequencing (WGS) to two or more DLBCL biopsies from patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Methods: Archival paraffin biopsies with DLBCL morphology were selected from 109 R-CHOP-treated patients, of which 55% had a detectable low-grade lymphoma at some point in their disease course. Recurrences were defined as primary refractory (REFR, n = 24), early relapse (ER, n = 29), or late relapse (LR, n = 56) within <9, 9-24, or >24 months from the first DLBCL biopsy, respectively. Break-apart FISH (n = 101 pairs) was used to identify oncogene translocations and the NanoString DLBCL90 assay (n = 106 pairs) identified cell-of-origin (COO) subgroups. Simple somatic mutations (SSMs) were identified from WGS (n = 52 tumour pairs plus matched constitutional DNA) using an ensemble of four variant callers (Strelka2, LoFreq, Mutect2 and SAGE), and somatic copy number variations (CNVs) were detected using Battenberg. The LymphGen classifier was applied to assign genetic subgroups. Results: MYC and BCL6 translocation status was discordant between time points in 16% and 15% of tumour pairs, respectively. BCL2 translocations were concordant in all cases, consistent with their acquisition during VDJ recombination early in B-cell differentiation. Among pairs with DLBCL90 data, 9% (one ER and 6 LR) were discordant for COO, excluding cases that were unclassified at either time point. Of the 52 pairs with WGS, LymphGen classified 27 primary tumors and 31 secondary tumors, and the classification was discordant in only one of 23 pairs that were classified at both time points. The mutational repertoire between time points in REFR pairs was strikingly consistent, reflecting little evolution. Interestingly, despite shared mutations and largely concordant genetic subgroup assignments, ER and LR pairs exhibited striking genetic divergence with mutation patterns indicative of branching evolution from a shared precursor cell. In spite of this divergence, unique driver mutations and aberrant somatic hypermutation tended to affect the same genes in both tumours. Figure 1 shows a representative LR pair from a patient with no record of low-grade disease. Keywords: Genomics, Epigenomics, and Other -Omics, Tumor Biology and Heterogeneity, Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract R. D. Morin Other remuneration: Named inventor on the DLBCL90 patent. D. W. Scott Other remuneration: Named inventor on the DLBCL90 patent.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».