Cyclooxygenase inhibitors for treating preterm labour? What is the evidence?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Preterm labour, a condition characterized by regular uterine contractions and cervical dilation prior to 37 weeks of pregnancy can result in premature birth of babies that may not be fully developed and/or possess serious health problems such as cerebral palsy and learning disabilities. Is associated with an increase in uterine prostaglandins (PGs) synthesis by cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes which promotes inflammatory and contractile processes that drive labour. For this reason, COX inhibitors (e.g. indomethacin) have been used to treat/prevent preterm labour. Despite limited success, tocolysis by COX‐inhibition carries serious adverse fetal effects due to inhibition of prostaglandin‐dependent developmental homeostatic functions. The more recent discovery of a second, inducible COX isoform, COX‐2, presented an opportunity to spare homeostatic prostaglandin by selective inhibition of COX‐2. However, subsequent clinical studies have called into question the appropriateness of COX‐2 selective inhibition. This study reviewed the molecular evidence concerning the role of COX‐2 in human parturition that underpins the rationale of use of COX‐2 inhibitors in the treatment of preterm labour and presents evidence of COX‐2 gene expression in term and preterm human myometrium. Methods For our systematic literature review, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify papers reporting molecular evidence of COX enzyme expression and activity in gestational tissues at term and preterm. Two independent reviewers evaluated abstracts, and qualifying references were reviewed in full text. Data were extracted using a standardized questionnaire. COX‐2 gene expression analysis was conducted on samples of myometrium and decidua from women at term (after 37 weeks) and preterm (below 37 weeks) of gestation, with and without labour using reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction technique (RT‐PCR). Results Thirty‐five studies were included in the review. Eight studies on fetal membranes (amnion and chorion) reported significantly higher COX expression or activity with labour. However, in the myometrium and decidua, which are the most relevant therapeutic target tissues for uterine contraction, nine reported no labour‐associated differences COX expression. In the myometrium, four studies reported higher levels of COX mRNA with labour, but did not consider protein expression. Our data show spatial (upper versus lower segment) and temporal (labour versus non‐labour) demonstrate differences in COX‐2 expression; at term, expression of COX‐2 is higher in lower segment myometrium and decidua samples from women in term labour ( n=16 ) compared to term non‐labour ( n=18 ), but no significant differences were observed for upper segment samples. Similarly, COX‐2 expression was higher in lower segment preterm labour This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,020 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».