Latent Bradykinin B <sub>2</sub> Receptor Agonist: Differential Vascular and Hemodynamic Effects Dependent On The Effector Carboxypeptidases
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background We previously reported interesting vascular effects from C‐terminal extended bradykinin (BK) sequences that behave as protease‐activated B 2 receptor (B 2 R) agonists. Further to these studies, we designed and evaluated new “prodrug” peptides extended around the BK sequence, as potential ligands, that could be activated by vascular or blood plasma peptidases. We have explored the possibility of a controlled release of the direct agonist D‐Arg 0 ‐BK (r‐BK) by two cycles of Arg‐carboxypeptidases (CP) from D‐Arg 0 ‐BK‐Arg‐Arg (r‐BK‐RR). Methods The affinity of both peptides for recombinant B 2 R was assessed using a [ 3 H]BK binding displacement assay in the presence of protease/peptidase inhibitors. The vascular actions of these kinins were evaluated in human isolated umbilical vein, a contractile bioassay for the B 2 R, and in anaesthetized rats instrumented to record hemodynamic responses to bolus intravenous (i.v.) injection of increasing doses of r‐BK, r‐BK‐RR, in the absence or presence of specific inhibitors. Results r‐BK exhibited an affinity practically equal to that of BK for the rat myc‐B 2 R construction, while the C‐terminal prolongation of r‐BK decreased the receptor affinity, 61‐fold for r‐BK‐RR. In vascular preparations, r‐BK was found as a potent contractile agent essentially unaffected by the blockade of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) with enalaprilat, and/or Arg‐CP with Plummer's inhibitor. The contractile effect of r‐BK‐RR was found to be about 7‐fold less potent than r‐BK and was only slightly decreased by the Plummer's inhibitor. Enalaprilat alone, or combined with the Plummer's inhibitor, was more effective to shift the concentration‐effect curve of r‐BK‐RR to the right by a factor 3.5; suggesting the removal of the Arg‐Arg extension in a single step by ACE. In anesthetized rats, r‐BK and r‐BK‐RR were virtually equipotent hypotensive agents. Both peptides caused similar rapid, transient and dose‐related hypotensive effects, that were extensively inhibited by icatibant (a B 2 R antagonist). The hypotensive effects of r‐BK were potentiated by enalaprilat, but not influenced by the Arg‐CP inhibitor, which is consistent with a minor role of Arg‐CP in the metabolism of r‐BK. However, in rats pretreated with both enalaprilat and Plummer's inhibitor, the hypotensive responses and the duration of the hypotensive episode to r‐BK were significantly potentiated, revealing the involvement of Arg‐CP in cessation of the hypotensive episode when the metabolism of r‐BK by ACE is inhibited. The hypotensive responses to r‐BK‐RR were not affected by enalaprilat, but were significantly reduced by pre‐treatment with Arg‐CP inhibitor alone or combined with enalaprilat, pharmacologically evidencing r‐BK regeneration likely by two cycles of Arg‐carboxypeptidases (CP). Conclusions Altogether, these results indicate that (A) C‐terminally extended analog r‐BK‐RR is an indirect activator of the B 2 R, via its conversion to r‐BK, and (B) in anesthetized rats, Arg‐CP activity is dominant over ACE to regenerate a B 2 R agonist from r‐BK‐RR. Support or Funding Information Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Fonds de recherche‐Santé du Québec . This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».