Investigating the Sex‐Based Differences in Lung Inflammation in an Obesity Model of Early Sepsis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Sepsis is a life‐threatening response to infection and the most common organ to fail is the lung. There is clinical data to support that obese individuals with sepsis may have a survival advantage. We have previously shown that male obese mice have reduced lung injury during early sepsis. There are sex differences in the response to sepsis with women generally having better outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine if obese female mice were also protected from sepsis‐induced lung inflammation. Methods 5 week old female C57BL/6 mice, housed in static cages, were randomized to either a high fat Western diet (HFD) (n=12) (Modified Breslow Dyets510151) or normal chow diet (NCD) (n=14) for 15 weeks. Diet restriction to 70% of normal intake was introduced gradually after 6 weeks of ad lib access to control the weight gain of the NCD group. Glycemic control was compared between groups at 14 weeks by a glucose tolerance test where mice were fasted for 6 hours then given 2 g/kg of 20% glucose solution IP follow by glucose measurements at 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes. At 20 weeks of age sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture with a single 18 ga puncture. All mice received 2 mls of Ringer's lactate subcutaneously prior to surgery and 500 ml immediately post‐surgery and 4 hours later. Animals were euthanized at 6 hrs and tissues and blood collected. Airway inflammation was assessed by quantifying lung myeloperoxidase activity in snap‐frozen lung tissue. Results Female mice fed the HFD diet gained significantly more weight (31.9 ± 1.9 (SE) g compared to 20.9 ± 0.8 g) and had larger livers (1.8 ± 0.2 g vs 0.8 ± 0.04g) compared to the NCD mice. HFD female also had higher glucose levels (peak 24.8 ± 1.8 mmol/l) compared to NCD (peak 16.6 ± 1.6 mmol/l) following a glucose challenge. WBC counts of HFD (1.1 ± 0.1 ×10 9 /l) and NCD (1.1 ± 0.1 ×10 9 /l) septic mice were significantly lower the sham operated mice (HFD 2.7 ± 0.2 ×10 9 /l vs NCD 2.0 ± 0.2 ×10 9 /l). In contrast to our previous findings in septic male mice, there were no significant differences observed in lung myeloperoxidase levels between the HFD and NCD female mice (24.1 ± 2.0 U/mg tissue compared to 27.6 ± 1.6 U/mg tissue). Conclusions In female mice fed a HFD weight gain is associated with glucose intolerance. In contrast to our published work in male mice, female obese mice gain significantly less weight and have smaller livers than their male counterparts. Importantly, obesity conferred no protection from early sepsis‐induced lung inflammation compared to NCD fed septic female mice. Support or Funding Information Funded from an internal funds administered by the Department of Medicine This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».