MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3175532113 · doi:10.1094/pdis-04-21-0771-pdn

First Report of <i>Dickeya fangzhongdai</i> Causing Soft Rot in Orchid in Canada

2021· article· en· W3175532113 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Aiguo Zhou, J. Nie, Yanli Tian, Jiacheng Chuan, Baishi Hu, Jixing Zou, Xiang Li

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlant Disease · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Établissements canadiensCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Organismes subventionnairesChina Scholarship Council
Mots-clésBiologyBotany

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dickeya fangzhongdai was originally described as the causal agent of bleeding canker of pear tree in China. Recently, D. fangzhongdai was isolated and identified as the causal agent of soft rot in an orchid plant purchased in a local supermarket in Prince Edward Island, Canada. A water-soaked dark green spot on the leaf surface was observed and later became larger soft rot symptom. The origin of the orchid plants was traced back to a producer in Ontario, Canada who propagated them from with cuttings originally imported from the Netherlands and Taiwan. Bacterial isolations were made from a soft rot lesion on an orchid leaf by surface sterilization of small pieces of marginal tissue of the diseased leaf in 70% alcohol. The small pieces of leaf tissue were then washed three time using sterile water, and immersed in drops of sterile water. Bacterial streaming was observed under the microscope and non-fluorescing bacterial colonies were isolated on King's B and casamino acid-peptone-glucose agar plates and purified as isolates 908, 909, 910 and 911. The DNA samples were extracted from the four isolates, as well as the diseased leaf tissue, and tested by using a qPCR assay with the specific primer/probe set (DfF/DfR/DfP) for D. fangzhongdai (Tian et al. 2020). The assay yielded PCR amplicons of 135 bp with a melting temperature of 86.5±0.6 °C as did two control reactions using genomic DNA from D. fangzhongdai strains JS5T and QZH3 originally isolated in China, providing presumptive identification of the orchid isolates as D. fangzhongdai. To fulfill Koch's postulates, freshly purchased healthy orchid plants (n=4) were inoculated by leaf injection with the bacterial isolates obtained in this study and strains JS5 T and QZH3 at ~107 CFU/ml. Three leaves of the same side of the plants were inoculated with the same strains as triplicates. Sterile water was used as the negative control. Inoculated plants were incubated in a growth chamber with a 16 h photoperiod at 23 °C. Water soaked lesions developed in 3-5 days after inoculation followed by soft rotting in leaves inoculated with the new bacterial strains from orchid plants while strain QZH3 caused soft rot in 10 days after inoculation (Fig. S1). The non-fluorescing bacteria on King's B plates with colony morphology similar to those inoculated were re-isolated from the inoculated leaves and confirmed to be D. fangzhongdai by qPCR. Phylogenetic analysis of the assembled 16S rRNA sequence of isolate 908 (GenBank accession number: MT984340), together with GenBank data of all Dickeya spp. and some Pectobacterium spp, using neighbor-joining (NJ) method inferred with MEGA X software (Kumar et al. 2018) showed that isolate 908 clustered with strains JS5T and QZH3 at a phylogenetic distance of 0.0007. This clearly indicated that isolate 908 and JS5T and QZH3 belong to the same genus. Species-level identification of isolate 908 was achieved by genome sequencing and analysis based on average nucleotide identity (ANI). Genomic DNA of isolate 908 was sequenced with Illumina MiSeq to provide approximately 180X genome coverage. After quality checking using FastQC (Andrews 2010), de-novo assembly was performed with VelvetOptimiser v2.2.6 (Zerbino and Birney 2008). The draft genome size of strain 908 was 4,938,027 bp consisting of 76 contigs with 56.8% G+C content and 63,801 bp as N50. The draft genome was checked for misassembled fragments using QUAST v5.0.2 (Gurevich et al. 2013) and found to be of good quality. The draft genome sequence is deposited in GenBank under the accession number of JADCNJ000000000. The draft genome sequence of strain 908 was compared to that of D. fangzhongdai JS5T type strain genome using FastANI v1.2 (Jain et al. 2018) resulting in an ANI value of 98.9%, which is above the 95% cut-off for the same species. Previously, it was reported that D. fangzhongdai caused soft rot in orchid in Europe (Alič et al. 2018) and in onions in New York (Ma et al. 2020). The difference in virulence among D. fangzhongdai strains warrants further investigation and their pathogenicity on potato is being investigated to evaluate any threat to the potato industry. To our knowledge, this is the first report of D. fangzhongdai causing soft rot disease on orchids in Canada and North America.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,192
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,385

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,199
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2021
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePlant Disease→Même sujetPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→Travaux en français237 207→