MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3176290153 · doi:10.22067/econg.v12i4.78330

میان بارهای سیال و ایزوتوپ های پایدار گوگرد در کانسار آهن سراب 3 (مجموعه معدنی آهن شهرک– شمال بیجار)

2021· article· fa· W3176290153 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
محمد معانی جو, مهرداد فردوسی راشد

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2021
Typearticle
Languefa
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Cenozoic magmatism in Central Iran has caused formation of contact metmorphed rocks especially skarns (Calagari and Hosseinzadeh, 2006, Karimzadeh Somarain and Moayyed, 2002). The skarns consist of valuable ore deposits. The Shahrak mining area is located on the border of Central Iran and Sanandaj-Sirjan zone (SSZ). This mining area includes 9 iron ore deposits. The Sarab 3 iron ore deposit is located to the south of them. The volcanic rocks of the study area include dacite, andesite, rhyolite and andesitic basalt has occurred during the Eocene period. The intrusive rocks of the study area include post early Miocene diorite- granodiorite, diorite and granite. The iron mineralization stage has formed in limestone-dolomite contact with intrusive igneous rocks (diorite- granodiorite and diorite) as a skarn deposit. The main ore of the Sarab 3 iron ore deposit is the magnetite and hematite. Limonite and goethite, pyrite, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite can also be seen. The ore deposit geometry is characterized by massive to lens-like shape. Materials and methods In addition to study of drilling cores, 70 samples were taken from them and the mine pit of the Sarab 3 iron ore deposit in order to study thin sections, thin-polish section, fluids inclusion and sulfur stable isotope. Finally, 20 samples were selected and studied at the Bu Ali Sina University of Hamedan. Fluid inclusion studies were performed on six doubly polished thin sections. These samples were taken from calcite in magnetite hosts. Measuring the temperature parameters was carried out at the mineralogical laboratory of Iran Mineral Processing Research Center to assist the Stage: THMS600 with Linkam model on ZEISS microscope. The temperature range is -196 to +600°C. The machine also has two controllers, heating (TP94) and cooling (LNP), a nitrogen tank (for the nitrogen pump for freezing) and a water tank (for cooling the device in high temperature). Calibration of Stage in heating has a precision of ± 0.6°C which was carried out with cesium nitrate with a melting point of 414 °C and freezing was carried out at a precision of ± 0.2 ° with a standard N-hexane material with a melting point of -94.3°C. Five sulfide samples were selected from an open pit of the Sarab 3 iron ore deposit and the isotopic ratio of their sulfur was measured at the Isotope Lab of the University of Queens, Canada. Results During the retrograde mineralization stage in the Sarab 3 iron ore deposit, the effects of the remaining fluid on the skarn rocks and adjacent hornfels result in release of calcium from the skarn and then transport of volatile matter into it. At this stage, the fluid is barren and it has a lower temperature and salinity than its original state. As a result of retrograde reactions, the replacement of high calcium calc-silicate minerals with a series of lower calcium minerals occurs. Also, some amounts of dissolved calcium are combined with carbonate ions in the fluid and thus calcite is formed in the faults and microfractures. Study of the fluid inclusions in the Sarab 3 iron ore deposit shows that the manufacturer fluids have been related to the retrograde phase and have lower salinity and temperature. The study of sulfur stable isotopes in the Sarab 3 iron ore deposit shows that sulfur may have been derived from one of these two sources: It has been created directly from the magmatic differentiation fluid or by the dissolution of previously sulfide igneous sources. The values of δ34S of mineralization fluids have been calculated from the Pyrite-H2S separation factor (Ohmoto and Rey, 1979), assuming that H2S is the most important sulfur compound in the mineralization fluid. Considering the amount of δ34S in the Sarab 3 iron ore deposit (3 to 3.6 permil) it can be stated that all of them can be attributed to hydrothermal fluids with magmatic sources. Also the amount of δ34S of H2S in the fluid equilibrated with sulfides of the Sarab 3 iron ore deposit was close to zero (0.8-1.9‰). Discussion and conclusion Due to the emplacement of intrusive bodies in the limestone-dolomite of the Qom formation with Oligo-Miocene age, the skarn mineralization has occurred in the Sarab 3 Iron ore deposit. The study of sulfur stable isotopes on pyrite in magnetite ore, has shown the source of mineralization fluids to be derived from magma. Skarns have been formed in several stages the last of which is the retrograde stage. Retrograde fluids have been overprinted on ore and affected it. Calcite veins and sulfides have been formed in the retrograde stage in the Sarab 3 iron ore deposit. In this study it was found that the temperature of fluid in the Sarab 3 iron ore deposit was about 115-324ºC and the salinity was about 0.4-35 wt.% NaCl. Acknowledgments Thanks to the Kimia Ma’aden Sepahan Company for collaborating in this research. Thanks to Ms. Aghajani for the accurate study of the fluids inclusion. We appreciate the help of Kurt Kyser from Queens University for measuring the stable isotopes of sulfur. References Calagari, A.A. and Hosseinzadeh, G., 2006. The Mineralogy of copper-bearing skarn to the east of the SungunChayriver, East-Azarbaigan, Iran. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 28(4–6): 423–438. Karimzadeh Somarain, A. and Moayyed, M., 2002. Granite and gabbrodirite-associated skarn deposits of NW Iran. Ore Geology Reviews, 20(3): 127–138. Ohmoto, H. and Rye, R.O., 1979. Isotope of sulfur and carbon. In: H.L. Barnes (Editor), Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 509–567.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,036
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,122

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0360,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,239
Tête enseignante GPT0,496
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Même sujetGeological and Geochemical Analysis→Travaux en français237 207→