MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3176305406 · doi:10.14264/a081ef6

The Assessment and Management of Cognitive-Communication Disorder in Parkinson’s Disease: Is Telepractice a Viable Alternative?

2021· dissertation· en· W3176305406 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Megan Swales

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe University of Queensland · 2021
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCognitionPopulationOutreachComprehensionPsychologyInternet privacyPsychiatryComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Cognitive-communication disorders are a common sequela in people with Parkinson’s disease (PwPD). Deficits are shown in the expression and comprehension of language as well as pragmatic communication behaviours. This impairment can have a detrimental impact on social participation, which can lead to withdrawal and feelings of frustration and isolation. Speech-language pathologists (SLP) are trained to assess and manage communication disorders. However, there is currently a lack of evidence on the clinical assessment and management of cognitive-communication disorders in PD. Despite this, SLPs are qualified to manage language and cognitive-communication in other clinical populations, and therefore, can provide PwPD with support. While speech-language pathology services are crucial in maintaining communicative function and quality of life (QoL), access to such services is limited on an international scale. There are several common barriers that prevent access to services, including the geographical spread of the population with the majority of health services based in metropolitan cities. One potential solution to overcome service barriers is telepractice. Telepractice is a service delivery model that harnesses technology and the internet to provide services from a distance. There is the potential for telepractice to increase access to services while also improving the quality and continuity of care. There is currently a lack of evidence for the use of telepractice to assess and manage cognitive-communication disorders in PD. Similarly, the perceptions of SLPs and PwPD in the use of telepractice as a mode of service delivery have not been explored.Overall the aims of this thesis were to 1) To investigate the current clinical practices of SLPs in Australia for managing cognitive-communication changes in PD and their views on telepractice, 2) To investigate the cognitive-communication difficulties of PwPD in Australia, access to speech language pathology services, and views on telepractice, 3) Determine the feasibility, validity, and reliability of an evidence-based assessment protocol for cognitive-communication function in PD via telepractice, and 4) Develop a potential evidence-based protocol for the management of cognitive-communication deficits in PD via telepractice. In order to address the thesis aims, a series of six studies were conducted from which five manuscripts were produced.Chapter 2 includes two studies which report on the development of two national surveys, one for SLPs (reported in Chapters 3 and 4) and one for PwPD (reported in Chapter 5 and 6). As a part of the survey development process, two qualitative semi-structured interview studies were conducted with PwPD (n=10) and SLPs (n=8) on the main topics of the proposed surveys. The remainder of this chapter reports on the development and testing process used to produce the final versions of the surveys.Chapter 3 (study three-part A) reports on the outcomes of the first part of the clinicians' national survey (n=99). This study investigated the types of assessment and management methods used for cognitive-communication in PD, as well as current issues on service delivery and accessing services. Chapter 4 (study three-part B) reports on the second part of the national survey regarding telepractice (n=63). This study found that SLPs view telepractice as a viable service delivery option for PwPD, but there are barriers that prevent uptake and implementation in current practices.Chapter 5 (study four-part A) investigated the communication changes experienced by PwPD (n=78) as well as their access to speech-language pathology services. Cognitive-communication impairments were frequently reported, but access to speech-language pathology services was low. Barriers that prevented access to services included lack of knowledge about speech-language pathology and the timeliness of referrals by primary care providers. Chapter 6 (study four-part B) reported on the telepractice section of the national survey. Overall, PwPD (n=70) had positive perceptions of telepractice for speech language pathology services. Several factors, such as ease of use of technology and financial reimbursement, were identified as important when considering telepractice.Chapter 7 (study five) reports on the feasibility, validity, and reliability of an evidence-based practice assessment protocol for cognitive-communication disorders in PD via telepractice. The protocol was selected based on the convergence of evidence from the current literature and SLPs assessment practices. The assessments chosen were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Subtests of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE-3), and the Mt Wilga High-Level Language Test (MWHHLT). This study found the assessments to be feasible to deliver online, with the majority of subtests attaining high validity, and inter-rater and intra-rater reliability.Chapter 8 (study six) outlines the development of a potential intervention protocol for cognitive-communication disorders in PD through triangulation of survey data from chapters 3 and 5 and group performance data from the assessments conducted in chapter 7. A task analysis was also conducted on this protocol to guide the selection of appropriate technology for delivery via telepractice in future research trials.The final chapter of the thesis (Chapter 9) provides an overview of the project findings, limitations, clinical implications, and areas for future research. In summary, this thesis provides evidence that: PwPD experience cognitive-communication disorders but currently have poor access to speech-language pathology services; many SLPs recognise the need to target cognitive-communication disorders in PD and the need for increased research evidence to support the management of this impairment; SLPs and PwPD perceive telepractice as a viable service delivery model; an assessment protocol for cognitive-communication disorder in PD via telepractice is feasible with most subtests achieving high validity and reliability, and finally an evidence-based practice intervention protocol for cognitive-communication disorders in PD delivered via telepractice has been developed for Phase I trials.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,388
Écart entre enseignants0,354 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe University of QueenslandMême sujetAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTravaux en français237 207