MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3176976111 · doi:10.1002/hon.35_2880

CLINICAL UTILITY OF INTERIM CT SCANS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING CHEMOIMMUNOTHERAPY FOR FIRST LINE TREATMENT OF FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA

2021· article· en· W3176976111 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Farheen Manji, Sita Bhella, Robert Kridel, Vishal Kukreti, John Kuruvilla, Anca Prica, Michael Crump

Notice bibliographique

RevueHematological Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineChemoimmunotherapyRituximabFollicular lymphomaInternal medicineSurgeryInterim analysisPrednisoneVincristineProgressive diseaseCyclophosphamideClinical trialLymphomaChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Interim imaging with computed tomography scanning (CT) has been performed midway through treatment during most clinical trials of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) receiving first line systemic therapy. Based on this, interim imaging is commonly performed, but there is little evidence of its utility in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to retrospectively review the outcomes of interim CTs (iCT) in adult patients with biopsy proven FL (grade 1-3a, 3b excluded) who met criteria for treatment and received first line therapy with rituximab with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (RCVP) or bendamustine and rituximab (BR) at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from January 1 2003- December 31 2018. Baseline patient characteristics and treatment were retrieved from a prospectively populated database, and results of interim and end of treatment CTs were evaluated from the electronic medical record. Disease response was assessed using Lugano response criteria as partial response (PR), complete response (CR), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD). Descriptive statistics and Kaplan Meier Survival functions with a log rank test were used for analysis. The study was approved by the Princess Margaret Research Ethics Board. A total of 190 patients were identified: mean age at diagnosis 58.6 years (IQR 49.2-67.8), 78% with stage III/IV disease, 26.8% bulky (>10cm) and 41.1% FLIPI score >2. Patients received either 6-8 cycles of RCVP (n = 69, 36.3%) or 6 cycles of BR (n = 121, 63.7%) with a median follow up of 75 months (range 6.6-204.0 months). Most patients (n = 177,93.1%) had interim imaging done between the end of cycle 2 and prior to cycle 5, most commonly CT scan (n = 174,91.5%). Most iCTs showed a PR (n = 147, 77.4 %), with a minority showing a CR (n = 15, 7.9%) and SD (n = 8, 4.2 %). Seven patients (3.7%) had PD noted on iCT. Four patients had a second malignancy identified on repeat biopsy of lesions found on iCT (thymoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma and spindle cell tumour), 2 of whom were symptomatic at the time of imaging. Of the 3 remaining patients, 2 were symptomatic at the time of iCT and only 1 had asymptomatic PD; all 3 had biopsies demonstrating transformation to diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The 3 year PFS of all patients was 85.29%. Patients with a PR on iCT had similar 3 year PFS compared to those with CR (86.25% vs 85.71%, p = .80) as well as overall survival (94.46% vs 92.31%, p = 0.58). Conclusion: iCT is not useful in identifying patients with asymptomatic early progression of FL during frontline treatment with BR or RCVP. The majority of patients receiving systemic treatment for FL with BR or RCVP have at least a PR on iCT, which is not associated with inferior PFS or OS compared to those with CR. Patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic PD during treatment warrant biopsy to identify histologic transformation or other malignancies. EA – previously submitted to ASCO 2021. The research was funded by: The Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation Keywords: Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract S. Bhella Consultant or advisory role: Celgene R. Kridel Research funding: Gilead Sciences, Roche V. Kukreti Consultant or advisory role: Kirin Kyoto J. Kuruvilla Consultant or advisory role: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Karyopharm, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics Honoraria: Amgen, Antengene, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics Research funding: Canadian Cancer Society, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Canada, Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation, Janssen, Roche, Astra Zeneca Other remuneration: Lymphoma Canada (Chair) A. Prica Honoraria: Astra-Zeneca, Gilead M. Crump Honoraria: Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Servier Research funding: Roche, epizyme

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,160
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,515

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,077
Tête enseignante GPT0,390
Écart entre enseignants0,313 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHematological OncologyMême sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207