Notice bibliographique
Résumé
On 4 March 2021, we lost a monumental figure in the world of aquatic sciences with the passing of David William Schindler.A mentor, colleague, friend, and inspiration to many, his scientific and environmental impacts were global in nature, but his was very much a Canadian story.The earlier Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada and the present Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (CJFAS) were the venues for more of his peer-reviewed publications than any other journal (64 of >300 papers).His strong appreciation for the intrinsic worth of nature made him a sentinel of freshwater ecosystems, advocating on their behalf for protection against the mounting pressures of humans.Besides being a natural historian, his keen intellect, sound logic, and candid manner enabled him to engage others, convincing many to change their ways even if it meant incurring inconveniences or financial loss.His environmental achievements were unprecedented, leading to international initiatives that helped improve and ensure air and water resources against the adverse impacts of global change.Like no other limnologist has or perhaps ever will, he advanced the aquatic sciences by filling critical knowledge gaps with ecologically realistic empirical evidence.As a child growing up near the Canadian-US border in northwestern Minnesota, his exploration of nearby lakes and forests lead to a lifelong connection for the outdoors.Later, higher education would foster this passion into a driven scientific curiosity about nature and eventually a need to advocate on its behalf.Undergraduate publications in Nature and Science and studies of trophic energy transfer as a Rhodes Scholar with Charles Elton at Oxford University set the stage for his career as a scientist.He would become an aquatic ecologist with a genuine and keen interest in the sciences, developing an expertise that span from biogeochemistry to biodiversity and ecosystem function.Despite offers of professorships from prestigious universities in the United States, he instead followed his love of "The North" and began his academic career in 1966 at a young Trent University in Peterborough, Ontario.Soon after, his path through life went near full circle as he returned to the Midwest just north of where he had grown up as a child.He had accepted a position at the Freshwater Institute in Winnipeg, taking on the challenge to set up the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) and its experimental ecosystem-level approach in northwestern Ontario.At ELA, he began his proud association with the Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.He started by demonstrating his knack for technical creativity by reporting on inventions and techniques to quantify primary (Schindler and Holmgren 1971;Schindler et al. 1972) and secondary production (Schindler 1969; Schindler et al. 1971a).He also published several other papers at this time to establish the basis for valuable long-term data of numerous lakes in and around
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,056 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,017 | 0,035 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».