The Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adults with visual impairments in canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose : The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on society but has disproportionately affected the disability population. The CNIB COVID-19 Impact Survey was distributed throughout Canada in May 2020 to gather information on the experiences of adults with visual impairments during the pandemic. This cross-sectional study identified key aspects in which those with vision loss have been impacted by the pandemic and associated policies and procedures. Methods : Analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS version 22 statistical software. Conventional descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample. Data were crosstabulated by age, age of sight loss onset, severity of sight loss, other disability or health condition, employment status, and education. Results : Approximately half (51%) of the sample had concerns about their healthcare, and just over half (58%) said they did not know where to get tested for SARS-CoV2. Key concerns reported by respondents included: 1. Touching things in public such as elevator panels, self-serve kiosks, or restroom doors to check signage (68% agreed). 2. Due to social distancing, they feel more depressed, sad, and lonely (64% agreed). 3. Because the individual does not drive, they will not be able to get themselves or a family member to a COVID-19 test centre or to a hospital or healthcare facility if they present with severe COVID-19 symptoms (61% agreed). 4. Getting access to accurate and current information about those who may be infected in their area (59% agreed). 5. Concern about accessing emergency medical services (50% agreed). 6. Unsure how to maintain appropriate social distance in public (48% agreed). Conclusions : The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted those with sight loss in many ways and in many different aspects of their lives. This study gave key insights into barriers affecting the societal participation of those with sight loss. While the findings of this study may have evolved over the course of the pandemic, these concerns are important for all levels of policy and advocacy leads to take into account while developing and revising existing policies. This study has provided evidence for the development of new policies and procedures, and the evaluation of existing policies and public health procedures to ensure those with sight loss are not put at an even greater disadvantage during these times and are able to receive the necessary supports.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».