Toward a Better Understanding of the Thermal and Cardiovascular Strain Experienced by Older Adults During Extreme Heat Events
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis evaluated physiological responses of young and older adults during extreme heat events and the extent to which commonly recommended heat-health guidelines (indoor temperature limits) and heat mitigation strategies (cooling centres) are effective at limiting hyperthermia and cardiovascular burden. A multidisciplinary narrative review and three experimental studies were conducted. In the review, the mechanisms by which aging impairs the regulation of body temperature and hemodynamic stability, and how they may contribute to the increased risk of heat-related mortality and morbidity in older adults, were summarized. A lack of ecologically minded study designs in previous research evaluating the physiological responses supporting homeostasis and health during heat stress (i.e., body temperature regulation and cardiovascular stability) was also identified. The three experiments were therefore designed as day-long (8-9 hour) extreme heat simulations to 1) evaluate age-related alterations in thermoregulatory and cardiovascular function during peak heat conditions; 2) assess how these responses translate to indoor environments; and 3) quantify the effectiveness of cooling centers, a widely recommended heat mitigation strategy, for limiting hyperthermia and cardiovascular burden. In the first study, healthy older adults (age: 64-78 years; n=19) stored 87 kJ [95% confidence limits: 33, 141] more heat than their younger (age: 19-31 years; n=20) counterparts (328 [71] kJ vs. 241 [SD: 87]; P<0.001) during the first three hours of a 9-hour exposure to extreme heat (40°C and 15% relative humidity). This resulted in a 0.4°C [0.2, 0.6] greater increase in body core temperature in the older adults that was maintained throughout exposure (1.0 [0.3] vs 0.6 [0.3]°C; P<0.001). These findings were extended in the second study, wherein it was demonstrated that healthy older adults (age: 66-78 years, n=8) exhibit progressive elevations in body temperatures (P<0.001) and attenuations in cardiovascular autonomic function (P<0.001) during 8 hours of rest in conditions representative of those experienced indoors during extreme heat events. These ranged from an actively cooled environment (22°C), through indoor temperature thresholds recommended by Toronto Public Health (26°C) and the World Health Organization (31°C), to poorly insulated and ventilated homes and/or dwellings without access to air conditioning (36°C; 45% relative humidity in all conditions). In the third study, it was shown that short-term exposure to a cool environment midway through (hours 5-6) a day-long (9 hour) simulated heat event reduced core temperature in a group of healthy older adults (age: 67-78 years; n=8) by 0.8°C [0.6, 1.0] compared to an age-matched group not removed from the heat (from study 1). Despite this, core temperature rose rapidly upon return to the heat and was statistically equivalent in both groups by the end of exposure (37.8 [0.3] vs 37.9 [0.3]°C; P=0.011). The findings of this thesis indicate that even healthy older adults experience sustained elevations in body temperature and cardiovascular burden during extreme heat events and that commonly recommended heat-health guidelines (indoor temperature limits) and mitigation strategies (cooling centres) may not provide adequate protection. Collectively, this work represents a considerable advance in our understanding of the physiological burden experienced by older adults during hot weather and extreme heat events.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».