MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3181325194 · doi:10.7939/r3-c8jx-y113

Investigating Treatments for Hemorrhagic Stroke Using Rodent Models

2020· article· en· W3181325194 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shannon Wowk

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStroke (engine)MedicineEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), when a blood vessel ruptures within the brain, affects approximately 15% of stroke victims in Canada. There are no proven neuroprotective treatments ICH but two therapies, therapeutic hypothermia (TH) and iron-chelators, have gained preclinical and clinical interest. Therapeutic hypothermia involves cooling the whole-body or brain to typically 32-35°C and has robust neuroprotective effects for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and cardiac arrest. However, the literature on treating ICH is inconclusive. Cooling lessens inflammation, edema and blood brain barrier damage after ICH; yet this has not consistently led to neuroprotection or functional benefit. To better understand these conflicting reports, this thesis investigated whether TH 1) does not mitigate key mechanisms of injury following ICH and/or 2) causes side effects that negate protective effects. Also, since iron-induced injury is a popular target in preclinical studies and causes greater neuronal death in ICH compared to other types of brain injury that TH protects against, the iron-chelator bipyridine was also evaluated. Our aim was to better understand the effects of TH on specific mechanisms of injury and evaluate a potential therapy that could then be studied in the future as a combination therapy with TH (e.g., an iron-chelator). The first two sets of experiments used simplistic models of injury to directly study the impact of TH on thrombin- and iron-induced injury. Thrombin is an important clotting factor that prevents on-going bleeding, but is also neurotoxic causing cell death, inflammation and edema. In the first study, thrombin was infused into the rats’ striatum followed by TH or maintained normothermia. TH treated rats had a greater number of degenerating neurons two weeks post-infusion but there was no effect on overall tissue loss, edema and functional impairment. This suggested that TH delays but does not prevent ongoing thrombin-induced neuronal damage. In the second study, FeCl2 was infused into the striatum to evaluate the influence of TH on iron-induced injury. This model of injury causes tissue loss and neurodegeneration, edema, functional impairment and a small amount of intracerebral bleeding. Therapeutic hypothermia significantly reduced bleeding after FeCl2 infusion but had no beneficial effect on any other measure. These results suggest that two key mechanisms of damage after ICH are not treated by TH. The third study focused on inflammation and hematoma resolution using a rodent model of ICH. It is well known that TH is a potent anti-inflammatory which can be protective, however, we hypothesized that this influence on inflammation would hamper the brain’s natural defenses for containing and resolving the hematoma. Interestingly, despite a considerable reduction in inflammatory cells, TH did not lead to a greater spread of iron into the perihematoma zone nor did it impact the rise in non-heme iron, an indirect measurement of hematoma resolution. Most importantly, we found that 40% of treated animals had significantly greater amounts of blood volume a week following stroke (i.e., 3 days following end of rewarming). At time points when treated animals were still being cooled, there was no increase in blood volume in treated groups compared to controls. These data suggest that TH does not impair endogenous mechanisms of hematoma containment and resolution but likely causes rebleeding following either treatment or rewarming in some animals. This substantial increase in blood volume, even in only a few animals, would likely counteract our ability to detect protective effects of TH in group averages. The intermittent nature of the rebleeding could explain the inconsistent neuroprotection seen in the literature and has important implications for clinical use. In the last set of experiments, bipyridine was investigated using two rodent models of ICH, collagenase and whole-blood, and the simplistic FeCl2 model. The collagenase model causes on-going bleeding by breaking down blood vessel walls. Bipyridine did not impact non-heme iron levels, edema or functional impairments in this model. In the whole-blood model, a bolus injection of autologous blood, bipyridine was not protective. As well, bipyridine did not impact FeCl2-induced tissue loss, neurodegeneration or behavioural impairment. Bipyridine did cause significant, transient hypothermia. Despite thorough evaluation of bipyridine, we found no beneficial effects, which suggests to us that bipyridine would not be a suitable therapy to combine with TH. In conclusion, TH did not effectively treat thrombin- or iron-induced injury and may cause re-bleeding complications.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,246
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchTravaux en français237 207