RIVER+CITY+LIFE: A Guide to Renewing Toronto's Lower Don Lands by Stoss Landscape Urbanism [EDRA/Places Awards 2008 -- Planning] - eScholarship
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
RIVER+CITY+LIFE: A Guide to Renewing Toronto’s Lower Don Lands Stoss Landscape Urbanism Cities have been rediscovering their waterfronts for several decades, using reinvestment to proclaim their heritage and to redefine their civic identity. These changes can be traced to changing urban geography, as new modes of transportation, deindustrialization, and new economies of scale have led formerly important industries to move away from the urban core. At the same time, vacant inner-city sites and a shrink- ing tax base have challenged municipalities to develop new income-generating strategies. Their solution has frequently been to rebrand older urban districts as destina- tions for tourists, entrepreneurs, or affluent new residents. River walks, museum parks, and civic centers have been used as catalysts in the effort to bring new cultural and civic institutions to the urban core. Above: The Stoss LU plan called for a renaturalization of the mouth of the Don River, creating a braided series of river channels that would allow changing patterns of flow and create a series of new residential areas. Opposite: The plan called for creation of an island park between the dual spans of an emblematic new “spider” bridge, a signature piece of sculptural infrastructure at the river’s mouth. Spearheading these changes have been attempts to clean up degraded urban environments and reframe them as urban amenities. Livable urban space is now conceived as attractive natural spaces and new public facilities to enjoy them. It is here that this Planning Award winner presents a subtle shift in the discipline of urban design. It marks the arrival of a new technique of place-making: natural ecologies of place. RIVER+CITY+LIFE was one of four invited entries in the second phase of an urban design competition for Toronto’s Lower Don Lands. It was not the winning entry; that honor went to a team led by Michael Van Valk- enburgh Associates, whose proposals were deemed more “cost effective and achievable.” Nevertheless, the EDRA/ Places jury felt the work by this team, led by Boston’s Stoss Landscape Urbanism, presented a stunning vision of the integration of urban form and natural process. This competition and several others like it in recent years have made it evident that Toronto is now second only to New York in North America in urban design ini- tiatives. Current policies emphasize high environmental standards, strong design review, and a focus on the public realm. Toronto is fast becoming a laboratory for this new focus on urban ecologies. Stoss Landscape Urbanism / RIVER+CITY+LIFE
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle