Private Assets Ascending: Public Pension Capital and New Financial Market Forces
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The authors of this article, Nicolas Firzli, WPC, David Weeks, AMNT, and the Hon. Nick Sherry, SEF, co-chaired the main financial roundtable during the COP21/Paris Agreement conference: the Paris Climate Finance Roundtable (CFR) , alongside Dr. Jeffrey Sachs, Director, Center for Sustainable Development (CSD), Columbia University. This high-level conference spearheaded the twin notions that a “climate smart future is an imperative for meeting the Sustainable Development Goals” and that “the secular quest for yields” fuelled by monetary complacency, combined with “the coming Sino-American rivalry”, would eventually accelerate the deployment of pension and sovereign wealth fund (PSWF) capital towards “private market assets” such as real estate, infrastructure, private equity, venture capital and farmland. As part of the preparatory work (‘travaux preparatoires’) of the 2021 ESG Summit and G20 Pensions Forum held later this year in Paris (28 & 29 October 2021), on the sidelines of the G20 Summit (Rome Summit, 31 October 2021), the authors sat with experts from key jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, Singapore, the United States, the European Union (EU), Australia, China and the MENA area, to take stock of and discuss key issues such as ‘the rise of private market assets’, the ‘Biden Infrastructure Investment Plan’ in the United States, the G7's ‘New Global Infrastructure Initiative’ (NGII) focusing on the Indo-Pacific area, Centra Asia and Africa, and, more generally, the rise of fiduciary capitalism in the ‘Post-Covid Era’. The authors also discuss the latest version of their Private Market Assets Matrix (PMAM), also called Infrastructure and Private Markets Investment Matrix (IPMIM), an original strategic assessment tool first developed at the start of the previous decade by North American and EU experts. This updated and expanded version of the PMAM matrix was first presented by Firzli at the ‘Frontiers in Innovative Finance’ session (24 May 2021) of the World Bank Infrastructure Forum 2021, held in Washington DC and digitally (17 – 27 May 2021). The strategic matrix “allows investors and policy makers to map out the future of institutional investment by visualising dynamically the proportion of assets allocated to infrastructure (Y axis) and non-listed assets overall (X axis) for a cross-section of pension funds perceived as highly representative of future trends.” The authors also show why large institutional asset owners could double their allocation to such assets in the next four years, shifting hundreds of billions of dollars annually towards infrastructure assets domestically and accelerating the investment flows coming into the United States from cash-rich Canadian, Northern EU, Singaporean, Gulf Arab and Australian pension and sovereign wealth funds. As a consequence, private market assets under management may grow by up to 20% per annum in the coming years (2021 – 2025), more than double the current rate.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».