QS2: Outcomes Of Pediatric Dynamic Facial Reanimation After Two Decades
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose: Pediatric facial paralysis has substantial functional consequences in a growing child including impaired quality of life. Microneurovascular facial reanimation is the gold standard for smile reconstruction; however, quantitative data are lacking regarding long-term outcomes, particularly beyond 10 years. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term surgical and patient-reported outcomes after dynamic reconstruction of unilateral facial paralysis in childhood. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed of patients in our institutional facial paralysis database (1978-2008) who underwent dynamic reconstruction of unilateral facial paralysis 20 or more years ago. All patients were treated as children with a staged cross face nerve graft and free functioning muscle transfer. Frontal facial photographs in repose and maximal smile prior to surgery, within 2 years post-surgery, and at long term follow-up were analyzed using the MEEI Face-Gram software for commissure excursion. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained using the FaCE Scale for subjective facial impairment and disability, as well as the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Outcome and FACE-Q Social Function scales. Results are reported as median [IQR] and non-parametric statistical analysis was performed with alpha of 0.05. Results: Eleven patients were included with long term follow-up of 23.7 [5.6] years (6 females, 5 males; 5 congenital, 6 acquired; age at surgery 7.3 [6.3] years). For surgical quantitative measures, commissure excursion significantly improved from prior to surgery (-1.3 [7.4] mm) compared to follow up within 2 years post-surgery (7.0 [1.7] mm) (p<0.05) and from prior to surgery compared to long term follow-up (8.3 [4.9] mm) (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in commissure excursion within 2 years post-surgery and at long term follow-up (p>0.05). For patient-reported outcomes, median FaCE Scale scores showed good function for social function (81/100), oral function (88/100), facial comfort (92/100), and overall score (75/100). On the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Outcome scale, 10/11 respondents somewhat agreed or definitely agreed with the statement, “I am pleased with the result.” On the FACE-Q Social Function scale, 10/11 respondents somewhat agreed or definitely agreed with the statements, “I make a good first impression” and “I feel confident when I participate in group situations.” Conclusion: Dynamic reconstruction of unilateral facial paralysis in young children improves commissure excursion that is maintained at long-term follow up. As adults, these patients report a high level of satisfaction and social functioning with their smile reconstruction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».