Chemical Stability and CO<sub>2</sub> Electrolysis Performance of La<sub>0.3</sub>Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Fe<sub>0.7</sub>Cr<sub>0.3</sub>O<sub>3-</sub> <sub>δ</sub> in CO<sub>2</sub>/CO Environments
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
LMFCr (M = Sr, Ca) has emerged as a highly promising class of perovskite oxide materials for use as symmetrical electrodes in reversible solid oxide fuel cells (RSOFCs).1 While there are numerous studies on the efficacy of these materials as symmetrical electrodes for SOFCs,1-5 a detailed study on their chemical stability and electrochemical performance as fuel electrodes in CO2/CO environments has not yet been reported. This work aims to address the stability of the Sr analogue of LMFCr, namely, La0.3Sr0.7Fe0.7CrO3-δ (LSFCr), in low pO2 environments consisting of CO2/CO gas mixtures (10-11-10-18 atm) to establish the range of pO2 over which the electrode material is structurally and electrochemically stable. This is relevant under CO2 reduction conditions as the stability limit will define the allowable CO2 utilization in these cells in practice. The chemical and phase stability was studied on LSFCr powders and pellets via XRD, TGA, and SEM in different pO2 atmospheres ranging from pure CO2, CO (balance N2), and 90-70% CO2:10-30% CO containing mixtures. Powdered LSFCr remains structurally stable in 20-100% CO2 (balance N2, pO2 = 10-11 – 10-12 atm) from room temperature to 800 oC without any decomposition. On the other extreme, a reversible decomposition occurs at 800 oC in 30% CO (balance N2, pO2 ~ 10-26 atm) resulting in the formation of a Ruddlesden-Popper phase, Fe nanoparticles (NPs), and some carbon fibers, originating from the Fe NPs. However, this decomposition can be reversed by heat treatment in air at 800 oC. While no evidence for coke formation is obtained in 90-70% CO2:10-30% CO (pO2 = 10-17 – 10-18 atm) mixtures at 800 oC, in 70CO2:30CO, minor impurities of SrCO3 and Fe NPs are observed, with the latter potentially being beneficial to the electrochemical activity of the perovskite. Electrochemical characterization was carried out on symmetrical cells prepared by printing ~25 µm single phase LSFCr electrode layers, with an area of ca. 0.5 cm2, on both sides of a 1” diameter SDC buffered YSZ electrolyte, followed by painting on Au paste as the current collectors. The cells were mounted in an open flanges cell testing setup (Fiaxell, Switzerland) and supplied with 50 mL/min air at the oxygen electrode and 50 mL/min CO2:CO mixtures at the fuel electrode. The performance of full cells was determined in various CO2:CO ratios (Pure CO2, 90:10, and 70:30) at 800 oC via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and chronoamperometry. Consistent with prior work, symmetrical 2-electrode full cells showed very good electrochemical performance at 800 oC, both in the SOFC and SOEC modes. Furthermore, LSFCr full cells exhibited excellent short-term stability in 15-min potentiostatic stability tests at 1.2-1.5 V, while medium-term potentiostatic tests at 1.1 and 1.2 V showed that LSFCr exhibits exceptional stability during CO2 electrolysis in all gas atmospheres over several 100 hours, with the oxygen electrode facilitating the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the same time. These results suggest that LSFCr has the potential to be a very efficient and stable electrode material for symmetrical SOC applications. References (1) Chen, M.; Paulson, S.; Thangadurai, V.; Birss, V. Journal of Power Sources 2013, 236, 68-79. (2) Chen, M.; Paulson, S.; Thangadurai, V.; Birss, V. ECS Transactions 2012, 45, 343-348. (3) Chen, M.; Paulson, S.; Kan, W. H.; Thangadurai, V.; Birss, V. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2015, 3, 22614-22626. (4) Molero-Sanchez, B.; Addo, P.; Buyukaksoy, A.; Paulson, S.; Birss, V. Faraday Discussions 2015, 182, 159-175. (5) Addo, P. K.; Molero-Sanchez, B.; Chen, M.; Paulson, S.; Birss, V. Fuel Cells 2015, 15, 689-696.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».