The role of the adiponectin-adiponectin receptor pathway in human carotid atherosclerotic plaque instability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality and long-term disability in Canada. Carotid atherosclerotic plaque instability is a key cause of ischemic strokes. Current guidelines recommend surgical intervention (carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting) for stroke prevention based solely on the degree of carotid artery stenosis. However, stenosis alone is an incomplete determinant of a patient’s stroke risk as it does not entirely reflect how unstable a plaque truly is and its likelihood to rupture. Instead it has been increasingly recognized that plaque composition plays a critical role in defining plaque instability. Another major concern in carotid disease management is the lack of sex-specific guidelines, which has led to suboptimal prevention and treatment of strokes particularly in women. Therefore, it is imperative to identify the potential mechanisms involved in carotid plaque instability in women and in men. Adiponectin is the most abundantly secreted adipokine with vasculoprotective and anti-inflammatory properties that interacts with two transmembrane receptors, AdipoR1 and AdipoR2. A series of ex vivo and in vitro experiments were conducted in the development of this thesis. To achieve this, our large ongoing bio-bank of human carotid plaque specimens and blood samples were used to determine: (1) the contribution of the adiponectin-AdipoR pathway in carotid atherosclerotic plaque instability, (2) the effect of modulating this pathway in the monocyte-macrophage lineage, and (3) sex-specific signatures associated with the adiponectin-AdipoR pathway and plaque instability. Firstly, our results demonstrated that intraplaque expression of adiponectin plays a more important role in the context of plaque instability than circulating levels of total adiponectin. Moreover, we identified a novel association between decreased adiponectin-mediated signalling through the AdipoR2 pathway and greater plaque instability. This may impair the atheroprotective actions of adiponectin in the plaque and cause adiponectin resistance, thereby contributing to the accumulation of adiponectin observed in more vulnerable lesions. Secondly, our results contributed evidence suggesting that adiponectin may significantly improve the efficiency of the rate-limiting step of the cholesterol efflux process and promote nascent high-density lipoprotein biogenesis from macrophages via activation of both the AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 receptors. Thirdly, although statins are widely used for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, intensive statin therapy was found to compromise the expression and function of adiponectin and its receptors in the monocyte-macrophage lineage. Lastly, we demonstrated that men and women who underwent a carotid endarterectomy exhibit clear differences not only at the level of the plaque (i.e., plaque composition) but also at the level of the circulation (i.e., adipokine, lipid, and immune profiles). Specifically, we identified that a decrease in the high molecular-weight to total adiponectin ratio was independently associated with greater plaque instability specifically in women but not in men. Moreover, we have developed a comprehensive method to measure sex hormones using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry that will be used in the future to identify sex-specific signatures related to plaque instability in men and women. The results of these studies taken together, have provided evidence for the adiponectin-AdipoR pathway as a: (a) novel mechanism of plaque instability, (b) potential therapeutic target for plaque stabilization and ultimately, stroke prevention, and (c) probable sex-specific marker of plaque instability. Overall, our novel findings might be a stepping stone with the potential to ultimately lead to improvements in the identification, management, and treatment of ‘unstable’ carotid atherosclerosis
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».