MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3185922914 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00293-x

COVID-19 and maternal and perinatal outcomes – Authors' reply

2021· letter· en· W3185922914 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Barbara Chmielewska, Imogen Barratt, Rosemary Townsend, Erkan Kalafat, Jan van der Meulen, Ipek Gurol‐Urganci, Pat O’Brien, Edward Morris, Tim Draycott, Shakila Thangaratinam, Kirsty Le Doaré, Shamez Ladhani, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A. Magee, Asma Khalil

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Global Health · 2021
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesFaculty of Arts and SciencesChugai PharmaceuticalKoç ÜniversitesiNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustInstitute of Infection and ImmunityOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineGedeon RichterUniversity College LondonPublic Health EnglandSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNorth Bristol NHS TrustKing's College LondonUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustPfizer
Mots-clésCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Consistency (knowledge bases)Perinatal mortalityMedicineMaternity care2019-20 coronavirus outbreakQuality (philosophy)Key (lock)ObstetricsPregnancyIntensive care medicineOutbreakComputer scienceFetusVirologyBiologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)PhilosophyComputer securityArtificial intelligencePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We thank all correspondents for their interest in our report.1Chmielewska B Barratt I Townsend R et al.Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Glob Health. 2021; 9: e759-e772Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (627) Google Scholar A common point is the need for better quality studies in this area, which we wholeheartedly echo. Quality and consistency in reporting, particularly of key outcomes such as maternal death, stillbirth, and preterm birth, are essential if we are to tackle these scourges of maternity care. As always, systematic reviews are restricted to covering what has been published. Susannah Leisher and the International Stillbirth Alliance call for the inclusion of a relevant preprint paper. We recognised that the COVID-19 literature is a rapidly evolving field with high rates of preprint publication. In consultation with editors and reviewers, however, we agreed to exclude such papers to avoid the pseudo-inflation of the sample size and undermine confidence in the findings of the analysis, but acknowledge that this exclusion might have a greater effect on data from LMICs, which are recognised to be less likely to secure publication. We agree with Clara Calvert and colleagues, and did highlight in our Article, that the finding of an increase in maternal mortality relied on just two data sources, only one of which presented national-level data. The finding is consistent with another report from India not included in the quantitative analysis,2Goyal M Singh P Singh K Shekhar S Agrawal N Misra S The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal health due to delay in seeking health care: experience from a tertiary center.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021; 152: 231-235Crossref PubMed Scopus (135) Google Scholar and with national-level evidence from Kenya reported in a preprint publication.3Shikuku D Nyaoke I Gichuru S et al.Early indirect impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilization and outcomes of reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health services in Kenya.medRxiv. 2020; (published online Sept 9.) (preprint).https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.20191247Google Scholar But we agree that this early identification of increased maternal mortality cannot necessarily be extrapolated throughout the global population and that further investigation is required. We share Lizbeth Ochoa and colleagues' confidence in the finding that preterm birth seems to have decreased, in high-income countries at least, during the COVID-19 pandemic. We support their call for further robust investigations using population-level data of a high quality and considering stillbirth and preterm birth together. They suggest that we should have included another study in the quantitative synthesis.4Been JV Burgos Ochoa L Bertens LCM Schoenmakers S Steegers EAP Reiss IKM Impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on the incidence of preterm birth: a national quasi-experimental study.Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5: e604-e611Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (178) Google Scholar However, we were unable to include this otherwise excellent study because the report included four different time frames around three different implementation dates without extractable raw data. We read with interest Zeus Aranda and colleagues' experiences in delivering maternity care at their Partners in Health project sites and congratulate them on their successes. Key lessons include the importance of responses to local need based on acceptable and available models of care and resources, highlighted in their community health worker programmes in Lesotho, Malawi, and Mexico. The response to the COVID-19 pandemic has driven an explosion in remote access to health care, community reporting, and the use of technology in a diverse range of settings. We should use this opportunity to improve the coverage of pregnancy and neonatal surveillance data. EM reports grants from Chugai Pharma and Gedeon Richter; personal fees from Gedeon Richter and Pfizer; and other from Chugai Pharma and Kebomed, outside the submitted work; and is the president and a trustee of Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, is a trustee of the British Menopause Society; and is the chair of trustees for Group B Strep Support. All other authors declare no competing interests. COVID-19 and maternal and perinatal outcomesThe International Stillbirth Alliance welcomes the systematic review by Barbara Chmielewska and colleagues (June, 2021),1 particularly its inclusion of stillbirths, because these are often missing from the global agenda. The 28% increased pooled odds in reported stillbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic is concerning. We wish to highlight some data limitations that will impede action to reduce these preventable deaths. Full-Text PDF Open AccessCOVID-19 and maternal and perinatal outcomesWe echo the call made by Barbara Chmielewska and colleagues1 for better data to capture the effects of COVID-19 on maternal outcomes. Our own systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020219889, in progress) specifically focuses on the amount of maternal mortality as measured by the maternal mortality ratio, and our findings so far concur with their conclusion of an increase, but we advise caution in the interpretation of this trend. Full-Text PDF Open AccessCOVID-19 and maternal and perinatal outcomesWe commend Barbara Chmielewska and colleagues1 for undertaking a timely and comprehensive systematic review on a topic of pivotal global health importance. The increase in maternal mortality and stillbirths during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in low-resource settings, is of considerable concern. Although a substantial number of studies were collated, many have a substantial risk of bias. For example, of the 18 included studies assessing the link between the pandemic and preterm birth, only two had a quasi-experimental design, many did not have detailed methods, few adjusted for potential confounding factors, and only three included population-level data. Full-Text PDF Open AccessCOVID-19 and maternal and perinatal outcomesIn their systematic review and meta-analysis, Barbara Chmielewska and colleagues1 note significant increases in maternal death and stillbirths during the COVID-19 pandemic. They link these outcomes to reduced access to maternal health services, stating that in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), remote antenatal care appointments are less feasible because of technological shortcomings in these countries. Full-Text PDF Open AccessEffects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysisGlobal maternal and fetal outcomes have worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an increase in maternal deaths, stillbirth, ruptured ectopic pregnancies, and maternal depression. Some outcomes show considerable disparity between high-resource and low-resource settings. There is an urgent need to prioritise safe, accessible, and equitable maternity care within the strategic response to this pandemic and in future health crises. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,148
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,956

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,068
Tête enseignante GPT0,421
Écart entre enseignants0,353 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations15
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet Global HealthMême sujetCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionTravaux en français237 207