THE SYSTEM OF CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL WORKERS IN CANADA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction. Today the system of continuing professional development of social workers in Canada is well developed. However, this concept in its new perspective is not yet fully and universally operationalised and it is still in the process of evolution. Social work as a distinct profession is recognized in Ukraine. However, national educational standards still need to be revised, approved and used more effectively, and the concept of continuing professional development should be specified in the the ongoing development of educational programs for the profession. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to introduce Canadian experience in the area of continuing professional development of social workers as one of the best practices that should be explored and adapted in the area of professional education in Ukraine. Results. The majority of scientific works in the area of continuing professional development are found to be those published in English by foreign scholars; at the same time it should be noted that some Ukrainian scholars have proved their academic interest in this concept. Continuing professional development is defined as a process of ongoing education and development of professionals, from initial qualifying education and for the duration of professional life, and is aimed at maintaining competence to practice and increasing professional efficiency and expertise. A commitment to continuing professional development is grounded in the ethical principle articulated in the Canadian Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics that serves as the foundation for the Standards of Practice. It is focused on learning from experience, reflective learning and reviewing, and includes both formal and informal learning. It is often a self-directed process that driven by a professional, not by an employer. Originality. The article provides an insight into the definition of the notion of continuing professional education as a part of lifelong learning, which helps direct career development, uncover gaps in knowledge and skills, and open up further development needs. Conclusion. Following the above, the conclusion is made to the effect that the Canadian experience on continuing professional development helps social workers strive for personal and professional growth, inhance knowledge base and obtaine new skills.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».