Struggles for Mutuality: Conceptualizing Hosts as Participants in International Service Learning in Ghana
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We have been working in volunteer abroad programming for over seven years. In this time, we have formed long-lasting and moving relationships with students from the global North who have been transformed by the experience of living and working with people in the global South, and those who have not. We have lived, worked, laughed, commiserated, and cried alongside host families who have welcomed these students into their homes, washed their laundry, tolerated their complaints, and included them in their family life and events. As colleagues and friends, this chapter and the broader study emerge out of many discussions we have had working in international service learning (ISL) about our concern with the exclusion of host families from the planning, implementation, and imagining of ISL in a way that is more than tokenistic. This chapter emerges out of a larger research project that we undertook in the summers of 2013 and 2014 in Ecuador, Honduras, the Dominican Republic, Ghana, and Rwanda. We used surveys to ask host families about their experiences during the founding decade of Intercordia Canada (2003-2013). Intercordia Canada is a small, Canadian ISL organization founded by Jean Vanier that fosters human solidarity by encouraging young Canadians to be morally responsive and develop a respect and appreciation for religious, cultural, and socio-economic diversity by living and working alongside others who are different. The three principles of the work include: ‘being with’ is more important than ‘doing for’ others; encountering our weakness and vulnerability can be the source of significant growth and connection; and the journey of learning is best made together (Intercordia, 2015). We have both worked with this organization over the last seven years-as mentors, as campus representatives, as program planners, and more. As such, we are invested in this particular model of ISL, but also in the vision of Intercordia that values and centers hosts in the vision of programming and in the collaborative organizational structure that has allowed for growth and change within the organization.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».