Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You have accessJournal of UrologyHistory of Urology Forum II (HF02)1 Sep 2021HF02-04 THE TEMPLE OF PRIAPISM-WHAT? James Pike, and Michael Moran James PikeJames Pike More articles by this author , and Michael MoranMichael Moran More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001993.04AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Richard Payne Knight (1751-1824) was one of the early author’s whose focus clearly centered upon the cult of Priapus and the iconography that surrounded this ancient myth. Knight’s magisterial writings on the cult of Priapus just might be an overlooked masterpiece of early sexual thought. This is an investigation of both Knight and his tangential, descendent religion. METHODS: Knight noted the phallus as a pantheistic origin of religious beliefs, he even quoted a Christian ceremony where he witnessed in the Italian village of Isernia the villagers bought and carried ex-voti in the form of male organs. He observed that the women kissed them prior to dedicating phallic relics to the local saint. Keuls was another historian who suggested that if Knight’s Priapus were published a scant one hundred years later it probably would scarcely cause even one ruffled feather. “The history of phallocracies and their versions of ‘socially endorsed phallicism’ are almost preternatural considerations for the history of repression and emancipation, and this extraordinary status of the phallocracy arises from its having been the norm for so long.” RESULTS: Knight’s work attracted the attentions of Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802) and William Blake (1757-1827). Richard Knight was somewhat enigmatic in that he was certainly anticlerical, he was a bachelor, he was fascinated by the archeology of sex. He had a famed fireproof safe that safeguarded his priceless collection of antiquarian artefacts such as coins and bronzes at 3 Soho Square. J.M.W. Turner was a famous artist who came to the house often to inspect many of Knight’s treasures. Long after Knight’s death, phallicism still exists. D.F. Cassidy founded St. Priapus Church of Montreal (Temple Pontifex) in the 1980s. It is based upon the lore of Priapus which emphasized the phallus as a source of life, beauty, joy and pleasure. CONCLUSIONS: Knight’s observations are now utilized in the Scripture of the Holy Seed which is just another metaphor that accomplishes the same function as any other scriptural work, codifying the meanings of life itself and developing a programmed response by the faithful and the penis is the central iconic relic. Semen release is considered to be the consummate act of worship. Specific images of paganistic penii are utilized to personify the mythic capacity of the penis, such as Pan’s and the Pompeian images of Priapus himself. Now since several religions have already usurped Friday, Saturday and Sunday they specifically have chosen Monday’s as their day for worship. The church has become so popular that they now boast upwards to nine centers in Canada and eight in the U.S. Source of Funding: None © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e238-e238 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information James Pike More articles by this author Michael Moran More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».