MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3190574656 · doi:10.1097/apo.0000000000000398

Revisiting the Problem of Optic Nerve Detection in a Retinal Image Using Automated Machine Learning

2021· letter· en· W3190574656 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAsia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology · 2021
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Établissements canadiensCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOptic nerveComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRetinalImage (mathematics)Computer visionNeuroscienceOphthalmologyPsychologyMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: We read with great interest the recent review article entitled “Big Data in Ophthalmology” by Cheng et al.1 The authors discuss characteristics of big data and their potential applications in ophthalmology including their use in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning design. However, big data are not always available and small sample sizes are inevitable, particularly in the study of rare diseases. Various misconceptions have caused clinicians to believe that AI cannot be applied to their smaller health care and imaging data (small data). In this report, we hope to demonstrate to your readership that ophthalmologists can apply deep learning models on small data without the need for large datasets or coding. Over the past 2 decades, computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of retinal diseases has emerged as a powerful tool for disease detection. The initial step toward automatic identification of retinal pathology has traditionally been to locate the optic nerve, macula, and vascular arcades through handcrafted object segmentation.2 Feature-extraction systems were then used to detect pathologic features like exudates and haemorrhage by examining their geometric and color properties. The emergence of deep learning has revolutionized machine learning (ML) approaches for retinal diseases and has obviated the need for hand-engineering domain-specific features. Today, deep learning has been broadly applied to imaging data in ophthalmology and has also gained significant clinical traction. Until recently, the elaboration of ML models had been reserved to AI experts with coding skills. However, major advances in the democratization of AI were made possible by the release of automated ML (AutoML) platforms by leading technology companies. Using transfer learning and neural architecture search, AutoML allows users with small data to achieve state-of-the-art results by building on pretrained models that have been trained on big data. AutoML model design is carried out through a graphical interface that does not require coding.3 The feasibility of AutoML design for imaging and electronic health record data in ophthalmology has already been established.3,4 In this brief report, we demonstrate the design of an AutoML model to automatically locate the optic nerve in a retinal image without writing a single line of code. This proof-of-concept experiment that revisits a classic image analysis problem is a testament to the incredible advances that have been made in the field of AI since the early CAD systems. An ophthalmologist without coding experience (FA) carried out AutoML model design using images from the public database of the STARE Project (https://cecas.clemson.edu/∼ahoover/stare/). We identified 313 good-quality images depicting normal and pathologic fundi and uploaded them to the Google Cloud AutoML Vision Object platform for training (202 images), validation (30 images), and testing (81 images). The ophthalmologist annotated each image by generating bounding boxes using his computer mouse to surround the optic nerve (Supplemenatry Figure 1, https://links.lww.com/APJO/A90). We tested the AutoML model on the 81 images used by a landmark report from the STARE project that studied optic nerve detection using a traditional CAD algorithm called fuzzy convergence.5 The AutoML model had excellent diagnostic properties. The area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) was 0.983 with high precision (96.20%) and recall (93.83%). Those metrics are calculated by comparing the amount of overlap between a predicted bounding box (by AutoML) compared to the bounding box set by the ophthalmologist (ground truth) (Supplemenatry Figure 2, https://links.lww.com/APJO/A91). Accurate bounding boxes were more difficult to predict in cases of significant peripapillary atrophy and edema obscuring the margins of the optic disc. When we used the outcome described in the Hoover and Goldbaum study,5 all optic nerves (100%) were considered to have been successfully detected (vs 89% in their study). By revisiting this historic experiment and demonstrating improved performance without requiring skilled AI experts or a computationally expensive solution, we hope to have demonstrated to your readership the promise of AutoML. AutoML has the potential to be an innovative tool for the deployment of AI solutions on small data. By democratizing access to those solutions, valuable insights into rare retinal diseases can be gained. More work is needed to explain the fundamental mechanisms guiding these models’ predictions before the deployment of AutoML models.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,280
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle